Re: Messaging Memo for 9:30am Call
Speaking about a potential campaign today in Akron, Christie said, 'I've got a lot to work on before I worry about that decision and a day job that keeps me fairly busy,' according to KTIV.
Christie acknowledged today that he's 'considering' a run in 2016 while continuing to claim that he hasn't made a decision yet. 'When I do, I will certainly let everybody know,' he noted.
cdm
Hi everyone,
Attached please find a memo that Philippe and I put together that we think
captures our conversation last weekend on a beginning frame for how to
position HRC, ourselves, and our surrogates following Election Day, along
with some of our ideas on how to execute.
Talk to you all in the morning.
Nick
On 10/22/14, 11:19 AM, "Joanne Laszczych" <jlaszczych@cdmillsGroup.com>
wrote:Call is confirmed for 9:30am EDT on Sunday, 10/26.Please use:Dial i: 1-530-881-1000Code: 742374#-----Original Message-----From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com]Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:24 AMTo: Jake SullivanCc: Philippe Reines; Nicholas S Merrill; John Podesta; Robby Mook; JoanneLaszczychSubject: Re: Follow - up CallDoes 930am work better for folks then?cdmOn Oct 21, 2014, at 11:45 PM, Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivan@gmail.com>wrote:I'll be on a flight and could do 930 (Robby and I were skedded to speakthen)On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>wrote:Dear allCan you advise Joanne if a call at 9am Sunday will work for a followup call?Best.cdm
<Memo 11.5.docx>
Hi everyone, Attached please find a memo that Philippe and I put together that we think captures our conversation last weekend on a beginning frame for how to position HRC, ourselves, and our surrogates following Election Day, along with some of our ideas on how to execute. Talk to you all in the morning. Nick On 10/22/14, 11:19 AM, "Joanne Laszczych"wrote: >Call is confirmed for 9:30am EDT on Sunday, 10/26. > >Please use: > >Dial i: 1-530-881-1000 >Code: 742374# > >-----Original Message----- >From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:24 AM >To: Jake Sullivan >Cc: Philippe Reines; Nicholas S Merrill; John Podesta; Robby Mook; Joanne >Laszczych >Subject: Re: Follow - up Call > >Does 930am work better for folks then? > >cdm > >> On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:45 PM, Jake Sullivan >>wrote: >> >> I'll be on a flight and could do 930 (Robby and I were skedded to speak >>then) >> >>> On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Cheryl Mills >>>wrote: >>> >>> Dear all >>> >>> Can you advise Joanne if a call at 9am Sunday will work for a follow >>>up call? >>> >>> Best. >>> >>> cdm
[AGREE WITH OBSERVATIONS AND AUDIENCE TARGET OF THE INTRODUCTION]
NOTE: These are written in HRC’s voice but once agreed upon can be adapted for the communications team, surrogates, etc.
Q: Are you running for President?
[AGREE WITH SURROGACY FRAMEWORK]
We should view this period as a pre-cursor to what would give way to a larger strategy should she decide to run. Central to that will be communicating to the press how HRC is approaching this next phase.
[AGREE]
Our message, put simply, is this:
“HRC is talking to a wide swath of people about all of the issues that will affect the future of this country, how she can impact that debate, and how a campaign TODAY SHOULD WORK. SHE WANTS TO FIND AND UNDERSTAND the best, forward-looking ideas. SO SHE WILL cast a wide net. She may not agree with everyone, and they may not agree with her; but she wants to hear from people.
[AGREE WITH REST]
The goal of the next 8 weeks should be to practice discipline by conveying a simple message to a wide audience to preserve HRC’s ability to be thoughtful and make decisions on her own terms, with an increasing eye toward how such a strategy would evolve if/when she “Gets to yes.”
And as stated at top, she and we need to do so as genuinely and as authentically as possible.
[TOTALLY AGREE]
cdm
cdm
Hi everyone,
Attached please find a memo that Philippe and I put together that we think
captures our conversation last weekend on a beginning frame for how to
position HRC, ourselves, and our surrogates following Election Day, along
with some of our ideas on how to execute.
Talk to you all in the morning.
Nick
On 10/22/14, 11:19 AM, "Joanne Laszczych" <jlaszczych@cdmillsGroup.com>
wrote:Call is confirmed for 9:30am EDT on Sunday, 10/26.Please use:Dial i: 1-530-881-1000Code: 742374#-----Original Message-----From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com]Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:24 AMTo: Jake SullivanCc: Philippe Reines; Nicholas S Merrill; John Podesta; Robby Mook; JoanneLaszczychSubject: Re: Follow - up CallDoes 930am work better for folks then?cdmOn Oct 21, 2014, at 11:45 PM, Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivan@gmail.com>wrote:I'll be on a flight and could do 930 (Robby and I were skedded to speakthen)On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>wrote:Dear allCan you advise Joanne if a call at 9am Sunday will work for a followup call?Best.cdm
<Memo 11.5.docx>
From: Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: Messaging Memo for 9:30am Call
To: Nick Merrill <nmerrill@hrcoffice.com>
Cc: Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivan@gmail.com>, Philippe Reines <pir@hrcoffice.com>, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>, Robby Mook <robbymook@gmail.com>
[AGREE WITH OBSERVATIONS AND AUDIENCE TARGET OF THE INTRODUCTION]
NOTE: These are written in HRC’s voice but once agreed upon can be adapted for the communications team, surrogates, etc.
Q: Are you running for President?
[AGREE WITH SURROGACY FRAMEWORK]
We should view this period as a pre-cursor to what would give way to a larger strategy should she decide to run. Central to that will be communicating to the press how HRC is approaching this next phase.
[AGREE]
Our message, put simply, is this:
“HRC is talking to a wide swath of people about all of the issues that will affect the future of this country, how she can impact that debate, and how a campaign TODAY SHOULD WORK. SHE WANTS TO FIND AND UNDERSTAND the best, forward-looking ideas. SO SHE WILL cast a wide net. She may not agree with everyone, and they may not agree with her; but she wants to hear from people.
[AGREE WITH REST]
The goal of the next 8 weeks should be to practice discipline by conveying a simple message to a wide audience to preserve HRC’s ability to be thoughtful and make decisions on her own terms, with an increasing eye toward how such a strategy would evolve if/when she “Gets to yes.”
And as stated at top, she and we need to do so as genuinely and as authentically as possible.
[TOTALLY AGREE]
cdm
cdm
Hi everyone,
Attached please find a memo that Philippe and I put together that we think
captures our conversation last weekend on a beginning frame for how to
position HRC, ourselves, and our surrogates following Election Day, along
with some of our ideas on how to execute.
Talk to you all in the morning.
Nick
On 10/22/14, 11:19 AM, "Joanne Laszczych" <jlaszczych@cdmillsGroup.com>
wrote:Call is confirmed for 9:30am EDT on Sunday, 10/26.Please use:Dial i: 1-530-881-1000Code: 742374#-----Original Message-----From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com]Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:24 AMTo: Jake SullivanCc: Philippe Reines; Nicholas S Merrill; John Podesta; Robby Mook; JoanneLaszczychSubject: Re: Follow - up CallDoes 930am work better for folks then?cdmOn Oct 21, 2014, at 11:45 PM, Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivan@gmail.com>wrote:I'll be on a flight and could do 930 (Robby and I were skedded to speakthen)On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>wrote:Dear allCan you advise Joanne if a call at 9am Sunday will work for a followup call?Best.cdm
<Memo 11.5.docx>
2 catches: I think we need I to be clearer that there will be no decision in 2014 so the hounds can go back to the kennel. I don't like what's best for me preceding what's best for the country. I like a formulation that's more like what's in the best interest of the country or to channel Roy Spence, what's the promise of America and can I help deliver it. JP --Sent from my iPad-- john.podesta@gmail.com For scheduling: eryn.sepp@gmail.com > On Oct 25, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Nick Merrillwrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Attached please find a memo that Philippe and I put together that we think > captures our conversation last weekend on a beginning frame for how to > position HRC, ourselves, and our surrogates following Election Day, along > with some of our ideas on how to execute. > > Talk to you all in the morning. > > Nick > > > > On 10/22/14, 11:19 AM, "Joanne Laszczych" > wrote: > >> Call is confirmed for 9:30am EDT on Sunday, 10/26. >> >> Please use: >> >> Dial i: 1-530-881-1000 >> Code: 742374# >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:24 AM >> To: Jake Sullivan >> Cc: Philippe Reines; Nicholas S Merrill; John Podesta; Robby Mook; Joanne >> Laszczych >> Subject: Re: Follow - up Call >> >> Does 930am work better for folks then? >> >> cdm >> >>> On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:45 PM, Jake Sullivan >>> wrote: >>> >>> I'll be on a flight and could do 930 (Robby and I were skedded to speak >>> then) >>> >>>> On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Cheryl Mills >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear all >>>> >>>> Can you advise Joanne if a call at 9am Sunday will work for a follow >>>> up call? >>>> >>>> Best. >>>> >>>> cdm > >
So I gave more thought to the question of how she answers questions about her speeches and it was honestly harder than I thought. We all agree she should "own" it and be genuine, but explaining that it made financial sense or how it contributed to the endowment can lead to a dangerous downward spiral about money. It's also hard to say she was doing it as part of an outreach effort because then she's saying she reached out to those who could pay...and you get into a back-and-forth about what quantity of time was paid vs not paid.
For that reason, I think (a) the speeches shouldn't be brought up proactively in any way that invites attention and (b) I think any answer needs to ultimately pivot onto offense. I wanted to reach a better conclusion, but I'm stumped. Would love it if someone has something better.
Some thoughts on language below--I tried two frames for this and centered it around presumed partisanship in the coming months (I left it vague as to whether that's around budget or CIR, etc):
OPTION ONE: Middle Class
While I am obviously spending a lot of time thinking about my future, anyone who has ever known me knows that I like to stay busy. I’ve never wanted to stop working.
Partisans will always criticize me for whatever I do – including giving speeches. They just want to have a conversation about anything other than their actual policies. These are the same people spending another month creating gridlock that makes progress on critical issues like education or infrastructure jobs impossible. [Perhaps get into "what matters is what I've been saying to every audience I speak to--that we need to get this country working again for the middle class"...my only flag here is that I'd want a researcher to confirm that this won't invite unhelpful questions].
OPTION TWO: Republican Attacks
While I am obviously spending a lot of time thinking about my future, anyone who has ever known me knows that I like to stay busy. I’ve never wanted to stop working.
But its not surprising that some very partisan groups are always going to attack me for just about anything.
That’s part of what is wrong with Washington – that we’re in a constant cycle of overwhelmingly negative campaigns before a campaign even begins. Its one of the impediments to consensus in Washington.
And the costs of that gridlock aren’t just theatrics in Washington – its middle class families who can’t afford education because Washington isn’t doing enough to keep college affordable or the construction workers who is between jobs because Congress can’t even agree on previously bipartisan priorities like funding highways.
Q&A
Do you have any concerns about the optics of giving paid speeches where you’re being paid more in one hour than the annual income of most Americans?
I’m not surprised that there are some of the more partisan groups and politicians in Washington who would attack me for just about anything – including giving speeches.
But the truth is that when it comes to income inequality and helping the middle class, there are partisan extremists who would rather talk about anything other than policies. They’re spending another month creating gridlock that makes progress on critical issues like education or infrastructure jobs impossible.
2 catches:
I think we need I to be clearer that there will be no decision in 2014 so the hounds can go back to the kennel.
I don't like what's best for me preceding what's best for the country. I like a formulation that's more like what's in the best interest of the country or to channel Roy Spence, what's the promise of America and can I help deliver it.
JP
--Sent from my iPad--
john.podesta@gmail.com
For scheduling: eryn.sepp@gmail.com
> On Oct 25, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Nick Merrill <nmerrill@hrcoffice.com> wrote:
>
> <Memo 11.5.docx>> Hi everyone,
>
> Attached please find a memo that Philippe and I put together that we think
> captures our conversation last weekend on a beginning frame for how to
> position HRC, ourselves, and our surrogates following Election Day, along
> with some of our ideas on how to execute.
>
> Talk to you all in the morning.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> On 10/22/14, 11:19 AM, "Joanne Laszczych" <jlaszczych@cdmillsGroup.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Call is confirmed for 9:30am EDT on Sunday, 10/26.
>>
>> Please use:
>>
>> Dial i: 1-530-881-1000
>> Code: 742374#
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:24 AM
>> To: Jake Sullivan
>> Cc: Philippe Reines; Nicholas S Merrill; John Podesta; Robby Mook; Joanne
>> Laszczych
>> Subject: Re: Follow - up Call
>>
>> Does 930am work better for folks then?
>>
>> cdm
>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:45 PM, Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivan@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll be on a flight and could do 930 (Robby and I were skedded to speak
>>> then)
>>>
>>>> On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear all
>>>>
>>>> Can you advise Joanne if a call at 9am Sunday will work for a follow
>>>> up call?
>>>>
>>>> Best.
>>>>
>>>> cdm
>
