Updated Friends and Allies Email Talking Points

I also think this is strong.

But I think you need to explain this sentence.  The average person would be confused by the notion that her office didn't "allow for email use".  thx

Her office on the 7th floor of the State Department did not allow for email use, so she seldom used email during the workday.    

Mandy Grunwald

Grunwald Communications

202 973-9400

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Fallon <bfallon@hillaryclinton.com>
To: Sara Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com>
Cc: Phil Barnett <pbarnett@sb-atalaya.com>; Christina Reynolds <creynolds@hillaryclinton.com>; Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>; Jake Sullivan <jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com>; John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com>; Adrienne Elrod <aelrod@hillaryclinton.com>; Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com>; Philippe Reines <pir@hrcoffice.com>; David Kendall <dkendall@wc.com>; Katherine Turner <KTurner@wc.com>; Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>; Phil Schiliro <pschiliro@sb-atalaya.com>; Matt Siegler <matt@sb-atalaya.com>; Heather Samuelson <hsamuelson@cdmillsgroup.com>
Sent: Tue, Oct 20, 2015 11:36 am
Subject: Re: Friends and Allies Email Talking Points

I think these are excellent, esp the rich details about emails sent on weekends and holidays.

My only suggested edit (attached) is to rephrase 'not a major user of email' (which to the ear sounds a little contradictory to our emphasis on turning over 55k pages) to something like 'did not rely on email for her day-to-day work'

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Sara Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:

+ Fallon and Reynolds

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Phil Barnett <pbarnett@sb-atalaya.com> wrote:

We took a shot at drafting talking points for friends and allies on emails.  They are attached for your review.

Thanks,

Phil