Fw: Personnel org chart

FYI.  Latest version.  Pete and spent a little time on it yesterday, but he and Jim need to flesh out the campaign-related parts of it.  I'm going to spend time with Jim on Wednesday, bringing him to up to speed on everything we've been doing.




----- Original Message -----
From: Froman, Michael B [CAI]
To: Pete Rouse ; 'Jim Messina' 
Sent: Fri Oct 24 17:33:42 2008
Subject: Personnel org chart



Attached is a revised org chart for the Transition Personnel organization.  Pete and I spent a few minutes this morning adding some names, which I have added.

If you could focus on the blue boxes without names and without "V"/volunteers.  (The pages with white boxes are just intended to show how the organization fits together.)  Those are the areas where we could use names from the Campaign, if appropriate.  We can they fill in the rest, as needed.

Let me know if you want to discuss it over the weekend.  Look forward to your feedback.

Org is good.  People are problematic. Either too junior (Heather
Zeikel) or already committed to other issue stuff (heather again and
gayle)  Pete's here tomorrow afternoon. Should we hold the
conversation till then?

On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Froman, Michael B  wrote:
>
> FYI.  Latest version.  Pete and spent a little time on it yesterday, but he and Jim need to flesh out the campaign-related parts of it.  I'm going to spend time with Jim on Wednesday, bringing him to up to speed on everything we've been doing.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Froman, Michael B [CAI]
> To: Pete Rouse ; 'Jim Messina' 
> Sent: Fri Oct 24 17:33:42 2008
> Subject: Personnel org chart
>
>
>
> Attached is a revised org chart for the Transition Personnel organization.  Pete and I spent a few minutes this morning adding some names, which I have added.
>
> If you could focus on the blue boxes without names and without "V"/volunteers.  (The pages with white boxes are just intended to show how the organization fits together.)  Those are the areas where we could use names from the Campaign, if appropriate.  We can they fill in the rest, as needed.
>
> Let me know if you want to discuss it over the weekend.  Look forward to your feedback.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Sure.  Let me know when you'd like to speak, and I'll try to work other things around it.




----- Original Message -----
From: John Podesta 
To: Froman, Michael B [CAI]
Sent: Sat Oct 25 15:03:45 2008
Subject: Re: Fw: Personnel org chart

Org is good.  People are problematic. Either too junior (Heather
Zeikel) or already committed to other issue stuff (heather again and
gayle)  Pete's here tomorrow afternoon. Should we hold the
conversation till then?

On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Froman, Michael B  wrote:
>
> FYI.  Latest version.  Pete and spent a little time on it yesterday, but he and Jim need to flesh out the campaign-related parts of it.  I'm going to spend time with Jim on Wednesday, bringing him to up to speed on everything we've been doing.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Froman, Michael B [CAI]
> To: Pete Rouse ; 'Jim Messina' 
> Sent: Fri Oct 24 17:33:42 2008
> Subject: Personnel org chart
>
>
>
> Attached is a revised org chart for the Transition Personnel organization.  Pete and I spent a few minutes this morning adding some names, which I have added.
>
> If you could focus on the blue boxes without names and without "V"/volunteers.  (The pages with white boxes are just intended to show how the organization fits together.)  Those are the areas where we could use names from the Campaign, if appropriate.  We can they fill in the rest, as needed.
>
> Let me know if you want to discuss it over the weekend.  Look forward to your feedback.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>