Re: FW: Article: The Great Divide (by Ryan Lizza, The New Yorker, Mar 21 2016)
On Friday, March 18, 2016, Sandler, Herbert <hms@sandlerfoundation.org> wrote:
On Friday, March 18, 2016, Sandler, Herbert <hms@sandlerfoundation.org> wrote:
I agree. I assume you mean the Hacker/Pierson piece in the Times. I thought it was outstanding, and in fact, quite important. The problem is that Hillary sometimes makes it easy for articles like the Lizza piece to resonate.
From: John Podesta [mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 10:06 AM
To: Sandler, Herbert
Subject: Re: FW: Article: The Great Divide (by Ryan Lizza, The New Yorker, Mar 21 2016)
Didn't think much of this. Thought the Jacob Hacker oped was really good.
On Friday, March 18, 2016, Sandler, Herbert <hms@sandlerfoundation.org> wrote:
I agree. I assume you mean the Hacker/Pierson piece in the Times. I thought it was outstanding, and in fact, quite important. The problem is that Hillary sometimes makes it easy for articles like the Lizza piece to resonate.
From: John Podesta [mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 10:06 AM
To: Sandler, Herbert
Subject: Re: FW: Article: The Great Divide (by Ryan Lizza, The New Yorker, Mar 21 2016)
Didn't think much of this. Thought the Jacob Hacker oped was really good.
On Friday, March 18, 2016, Sandler, Herbert <hms@sandlerfoundation.org> wrote: