Re: Re:
the chomsky questions.? any headway„
please note
EFTA01200340
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
I understand, mathematics are the unique formalism for proofs. . I watch the lack of direction and leadership. , as in cognitive theory, with lots of data and no much beter understanding, I m hying to have you give a new generation directions . prize, test. proof. demonstration. etc. as the evidence of real advance. how is it without your must be much different
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Noam Chomsky <> wrote:
Some efforts, but nothing satisfying. One problem is a fundamental difference between math and science. When a math problem is posed and solved, it's solved. There's a proof. There are no proofs in the empirical world. Just better theories, that could be (and usually are) at least partially wrong.
"easy" , is for others
- glad she hasn't left .1 think of you two as pluto and its moon
EFTA01200339
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Noam Chomsky I> wrote:
Mathematicians are lucky. Even more so than logicians, who worry about foundations.
As for the sciences, the luckiest is physics. If a molecule is too big, or some other system too complex, they handed over to the chemists — who do the same with the biologists — who proceed to the psychological sciences — and then on to history and literature. And of course depth of explanation is necessarily sacrificed along the way as complexity mounts.
There are a few exceptions. Parts of linguistics, for example. It would be good to widen that bridgehead, but not easy.
Valeria hasn't been able to leave yet. Maybe in a couple of days.
The image is not a chart. It is a drawing of the Disney character Pluto.
Key entities: Pluto (Disney character)
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Noam Chomsky <> wrote:
Who's Pluto?
at your age, if anything sticks up, be proud
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Noam Chomsky <> wrote:
I'd buy them right off if it weren't for the one sticking up. Will get in the way of my yarmulke.
good , it still has feelings as well
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Noam Chomsky < > wrote:
Ouch.