(no subject)

Confidential

This is a draft of what I intended to

send Bruck. Please read it and we can discuss.

Λ

Λ

Sent from my iPhone

please note
The information contained in this
communication is
confidential, may be
attorney-client privileged, may
constitute
inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property
of

JEE

Unauthorized use,
disclosure or copying of this
communication
or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received
this
communication in error, please notify
us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail
to
and
destroy this communication and all
copies thereof,
including all attachments.
copyright -all rights reserved

please note

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to and

EFTA01035375

destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

EFTA01035376

no

, lynn forresterl . silly she hates both of us. . but if he prefers to say lynn told him that i was her financail advisor13 he never introduced me to anyone, steven j gould and marvin minsky did18 leave out19 -22 . all allegtations nver tested under oath23, his video were placed there by the police and caught the houseman which they quote24-27 unsubstatated allegations30. he was the only person talking to krisher be careful31 it comes from a quote re the difference between murder and prostituion32 he did present my space to krisher.

34 35. searches

never happend , palintiffs lawyers fabrications38, careful . he and roy worked together39 grand jury one count of solictioant4l, it ws meant as protection for the jane does that brought their friends

EFTA01035373

ask the fact checker if we might shater with alan let hin decide

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:13 PM Martin Weinberg < > wrote:

The threshold issue is whether we release Alan to do an answer in the par by par format. John thinks we should not authorize Alan to use the questions. The alternative is he can write a letter without the paragraphs.

Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza
Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116

• Office
• Cell

This Electronic Message contains information from the Law

This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, M., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.

This is what Alan would like to send subject to getting OK to say he recvd questions from us. He can certainly rewrite without the Q by Q response if I tell him he cannot disclose the receipt of the list. If there are portions (like naming all the names) that we want out, it should be communicated. We had every right to ask him about certain paragraphs. I have sent this only to you for review.

Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.

20 Park Plaza

Suite 1000

Boston, MA 02116

• Office
• Cell

This Electronic Message

contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, M., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.