Re: CONFIDENTIAL and ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE
now that the NYT , the paper of
record has gotten so many facts and conclusions
wrong.
I
thought a direct response to the editorial board
was
EFTA01031975
now
appropriate. thoughts on more than one member
of
the team on the byline? . starting with the suggestion
that 5 professional criminal defense attorney somehow
colluded with alex acosta is preposterous.
.
it
EFTA01031976
was
reviewed by many sets of eyes at DOJ / reference
sloman
letter?
. the attack on the decision to require
Epstein
to
plead in the state.rather than in fed court . was
an
outcome
dictated by the fact that this was a
quintessential
EFTA01031977
state case. A florida case of sex for money.
The ages
of a minority of the women actually under 18 at the time.
and the govt contending with the fact that many of them
said
they had misrepresented their age to epstein and
the
clubs
EFTA01031978
at which they worked. ? . There was never a sex
party.
Epstein does not have parties. . he had a science
gathering and allegations were made that one of the women
was required to have sex with academics world leaders.
academics including stephen hawkins.. ? the guest list
EFTA01031979
were used to
accuse people of sex assault. ). President
Clinton
was never ever on his island. no proof , neither
was
al gore. . at
some point a newspaper , should take a step back
and
in
its
desire to craft a story re a trump cabinet member and
check its facts. ? etc.
thoughts.
please note
EFTA01031981
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged,
may
constitute inside information, and is intended only
for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly
EFTA01031982
prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com,
and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights
reserved
EFTA01031983
please
note
The information contained in this
communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client
privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is
intended only for
the
use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or
copying of this
communication or any part thereof is
strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have
received this
communication in error, please notify
us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com,
and
destroy this
communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright
-all rights reserved
EFTA01031985
please note
The information contained in this
communication is
confidential, may be
attorney-client privileged, may
constitute
inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property
of
JEE
Unauthorized use,
disclosure or copying of this
communication
or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received
this
communication in error, please notify
us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail
to jeevacation@gmail.com,
and
destroy this communication and all
copies thereof,
including all attachments.
copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA01031987
A very quick morning
stab at a possible letter to editor.- hopefully to motivate
edits, discussion, revisions, I think this route
makes
far
more sense than uninvited Op-Eds. Also consistent
with
a
draft being edited to be sent to Sen Sasse. The NYT
Editorial is enraging in its political bias - and is deeply
EFTA01031971
damaging.
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza
Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
- Office
EFTA01031972
- Cell
This Electronic
Message
contains information from the Law Office of Martin G.
Weinberg, and may be privileged. The [ ]
information
is
intended for the use of the addressee only. If you
are
not
the addressee, please note that any disclosure,
copying,
distribution, or use of the contents of this message is
prohibited.
well done
EFTA01031970
thx
This is
great. Highly recommend that we not let perfect be
the
enemy of the good and get this submitted ASAP while
fresh
and NYT Ed Board should feel pressure to
publish.
Quick
suggestions marked on the attached.
EFTA01031966
DARREN
K. INDYKE
5300 W.
Atlantic Avenue, Suite 602
Delray Beach, Florida 33484
Telephone:
[ ]
Telecopier:
I
Mobile:
EFTA01031967
email:
The information contained
in this communication is confidential, may
be attorney-client
privileged, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Darren K. Indyke.
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of
this communication
or any part thereof is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
EFTA01031968
have received
this
communication
in error, please notify us immediately by return
e-mail,
and destroy this
communication and all copies
thereof, including all attachments.
Copyright of Darren K. Indyke - C
2019 Darren K. Indyke - All rights reserved.
thanks, most included in
EFTA01031964
latest draft
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza
Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
Office
Cell
This Electronic Message
contains information from the Law Office of Martin G.
Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not
the addressee, please note that any disclosure,
copying,
distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
do we
mention that we are also writing to sasse .?
I don't think it
necessary
The longer this is, the more likely for editing
Ken thinks Alan should co-sign. OK with you?
Without a name, I think we send to the Letters to the Editor eg by noon and then have followup to make sure its received,
EFTA01031963
published
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza
Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
Office
Cell
This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
the point
was that you write that academics were accused doesnt alan s byline , become the focal?
we drop him in middle of signatories
he is in their editorial so his absence as a co-signatory is noticeable
but your instinct may be right to omit
Lilly? good to have female. I think we pick a time for roy, lilly and send to Editors. Then followup to push for publication.I have asked Ken to get us a contact. alan too. no reply to those requests.
I have not sent to Lilly thinking you wanted to but can, let me know
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza
Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
- Office
- Cell
This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.