(no subject)

Mike and Justin,

I trust this message finds you both well.

I wanted to let you know that I received the attached self-explanatory correspondence by certified mail today from the Miami Herald. I obviously will not respond.

I assume you received a similar inquiry but just wanted to be sure that you were aware of the communication. I am copying Sarah on this note so that she is contemporaneously apprised of the Herald's effort to reach her through my office.

Best,

Johnny

NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you may not read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this message or its attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by email and delete all copies of the message immediately.

This message is directed to and is for the use of the above-noted addressee only, and its contents may be legally privileged or confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, dissemination, or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender. This message is not intended to be an electronic signature nor to constitute an agreement of any kind under applicable law unless otherwise expressly indicated hereon.

did they get it unsealed? is this the time for someone to pooint out all girls got paid. . no fed case. . at home.? etc. alan ken starr. . ? etc.

I think any statement — should we elect to make one - should talk of finality, your life since 2008, lived a virtuous life after paying your price with a severe not benign sentence J Sweet denies the unsealing — see article - https://www.law.cominewyorklawjoumal/2018/10/15/privacy-trumps-right-of-access-to-judicial-documents-in-giuffre-v-maxwell/ Miami Herald files appeal in 2d Circuit - https://www.pacermonitoccom/public/case/25805805/Giuffre v Maxwell

This is consistent with what they told J Sweet in the Giuffre case, see attached for paragraphs that parallel the letter. They relied on Holland & Knight (one of the largest Fla-centric law firms) to do 35 pgs of pleadings to get their reporter the sealed materials. I don't know Julie Brown but I could ask Roy and Jack if either has had any experience with her — or if they know the attorney who signed the pleadings for the Herald. This did not happen by accident. She has done reports on criminal law and women's issues before.