Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right Fwd: Flying club
arrow_back

Fwd: Flying club

2 messages picture_as_pdf Source PDF
U
Unknown Apr 20, 2013 12:24 AM
To
Dean

Hi Dean,

I was nice talking to you earlier and I hope your event went well.

I spoke with a few people this afternoon, including an FAA inspector, an aviation attorney and a person in charge of AOPA's new flying club initiative and I have some answers for you. You can definitely operate as a private flying club exclusive to your employees. The flight training would have to be done in accordance with FAR part 61 whether you are a flight school, flying club or independent instructor, but as opposed to a Part 141 flight school, your curriculum does NOT need to be approved by the FAA. Flight instruction is also exempt from the commercial operator certificate requirement. (Part 119) The next question is whether you would be subject to the same maintenance requirements as a flight school and that comes down to whether your employees would be paying you (the company) for their flight training. If you provide the aircraft & instructor 'for hire', you would be required to comply with the 100hour mx requirement. If that is a concern, there seem to be a few ways around it and an attorney who recently researched this for AOPA is looking into it so I can have more information for you next week. The FAA rules are pretty straight-forward but there may be additional insurance requirements as well as local airport operating rules governing flight training at the field. I understand the premiums vary quite a bit depending mainly on the number of pilots per aircraft in your flying club and their experience. I tried to speak to an insurance rep but he was gone for the day so I can check on that next week.

As far as airplane recommendations, I instruct mostly in C172s with G1000 avionics but our school has a fleet of over 20 planes ranging from light sports to high performance Cirrus SR22. I've flown most of them and I have to say the Cirrus safety features like the stability protection, cuffed wings, parachute, FIKI and enhanced vision camera are very impressive. If you are looking for the best single engine piston, that's the one I would recommend. The downside of these high performance airplanes is a longer learning curve for someone who has never flown a plane. The SR22 may be a bit too fast but the SR20 could be a good option. It has a constant speed prop just like a 182 but instead of a separate prop control it uses a cam actuator in the throttle to increase prop pitch with increase in power. That's why some students find the Cirrus easier to fly than a C182. Both would work very well for what you are trying to do so it just comes down to your preference...

Have a good evening and I look forward to talking to you soon.

Best,
CEO, Aviloop llc

U
Unknown Apr 20, 2013 4:35 AM
To
Jeff Epstein

FYI

Begin forwarded message:

From:
Subject: Flying club
Date: April 20, 2013 12:24:15 AM EDT
To:

Hi Dean,

I was nice talking to you earlier and I hope your event went well.

I spoke with a few people this afternoon, including an FAA inspector, an aviation attorney and a person in charge of AOPA's new flying club initiative and I have some answers for you. You can definitely operate as a private flying club exclusive to your employees. The flight training would have to be done in accordance with FAR part 61 whether you are a flight school, flying club or independent instructor, but as opposed to a Part 141 flight school, your curriculum does NOT need to be approved by the FAA. Flight instruction is also exempt from the commercial operator certificate requirement. (Part 119) The next question is whether you would be subject to the same maintenance requirements as a flight school and that comes down to whether your employees would be paying you (the company) for their flight training. If you provide the aircraft & instructor 'for hire', you would be required to comply with the 100hour mx requirement. If that is a concern, there seem to be a few ways around it and an attorney who recently researched this for AOPA is looking into it so I can have more information for you next week. The FAA rules are pretty straight-forward but there may be additional insurance requirements as well as local airport operating rules governing flight training at the field. I understand the premiums vary quite a bit depending mainly on the number of pilots per aircraft in your flying club and their experience. I tried to speak to an insurance rep but he was gone for the day so I can check on that next week.

As far as airplane recommendations, I instruct mostly in C172s with G1000 avionics but our school has a fleet of over 20 planes ranging from light sports to high performance Cirrus SR22. I've flown most of them and I have to say the Cirrus safety features like the stability protection, cuffed wings, parachute, FIKI and enhanced vision camera are very impressive. If you are looking for the best single engine piston, that's the one I would recommend. The downside of these high performance airplanes is a longer learning curve for someone who has never flown a plane. The SR22 may be a bit too fast but the SR20 could be a good option. It has a constant speed prop just like a 182 but instead of a separate prop control it uses a cam actuator in the throttle to increase prop pitch with increase in power. That's why some students find the Cirrus easier to fly than a C182. Both would work very well for what you are trying to do so it just comes down to your preference...

Have a good evening and I look forward to talking to you soon.

Best,
CEO, Aviloop llc

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV