Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right Re: why not have the machine take iq tests
arrow_back

Re: why not have the machine take iq tests

1 message picture_as_pdf Source PDF
J
Jeffrey Epstein Feb 11, 2013 5:35 PM
To
Ben Goertzel

put toghetr a proposal

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Ben Goertzel > wrote:

Yeah... the child IQ tests would be a reasonable research focus.... I can see that making an AGI pass these tests would be attention-grabbing in the media, and also scientifically compelling to a certain subset of the community.

I'd have to find a child psychologist willing to actually share some specific test questions; they are cagey about supplying them online or in books for some reason... I guess they don't want parents to coach their tots on the specific questions ;p .... But that wouldn't be too hard.

Selmer Bringsjord, at RPI, has done some work making robots pass vision and movement oriented IQ tests

http://www.rpi.edu/dept/NewsComm/Magazine/dec02/atrensselaer/atrensselaer5.html

[Selmer is an interesting guy btw.... He is a rather good Al researcher, mathematician and cognitive scientist -- yet also a pretty hard-core Christian, who believes human-level AGI is impossible because computers and robots don't have souls !! The capability of the human mind to maintain fundamental contradictions, yet still reason logically in closely related areas, is pretty impressive...]

But Selmer is taking an approach of especially engineering and tuning a system just to pass each specific test.... To me, that is not very interesting.... It's like taking a really dumb kid and spending hundreds of hours coaching the kid on specific sorts of IQ questions that you know he is going to be asked. The child IQ tests could be a good objective for an AGI research project, but only if pursued in the right spirit...

Well ... let me know if you want to fund me and David Hanson to work on making one of his robots pass the child IQ tests ;-/ .... We could put together a brief proposal in this direction fairly quickly I would suppose. Robot-wise, this would actually just require a torso with hands/arms and a head with eyes & ears; we wouldn't need to worry about locomotion. AI-wise, it's basically the same stuff I'm trying to get done anyway, just a slightly different focus and a clearer evaluation mechanism...

BTW I am back in the US again right now, due to a family emergency.... I could possibly come up to NY again later in the week if you want to

EFTA00953909

seriously pursue this possibility.... I'll probably be back in Hong
Kong by the weekend.

thx ;)
ben

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jeffrey Epstein jeevacation@gmail.com wrote:
> it seems to me to be a more explicit well defined goal, you always ask
> what can i show you or others. I thinkg the ability to pass a number of iq
> tests for children, would provide focus if not insight
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I have looked at this test before:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wechsler_Preschool_and_Primary_Scale_of_Intelligence
>> Note that the test items often involve vision and action, not just
>> abstract puzzle solving...
>>
>> Making an OpenCog system do well on this test would be a great
>> objective for a research project....
>> Or, even if that's not the explicit objective of the research, I would
>> imagine that after some more development is done, it will be able to
>> pass those tests automatically...
>>
>> If an AI system first deals with these preschool/primary IQ problems,
>> and then moves on to the more advanced IQ problems -- THEN it will
>> probably be able to deal with the more advanced IQ problems in a more
>> human-like, AGI-ish way, rather than just solving them using very
>> specialized techniques...
>> -- Ben
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Jeffrey Epstein jeevacation@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> even iq tests for children. there are enough differnt types of tests
>>> making
>>>the sytem robust
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Ben Goertzel < wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> That's certainly a natural question to ask...
>>>>
>>>> I think one could engineer a system to do really well on current
>>>> written IQ tests, with a couple years' focused work by a small team...

EFTA00953910

>>>>
>>>>IQ tests are hard for people, because people do them using the same
>>>>abilities they use to do other, more complex and useful tasks.... But
>>>>just as folks have engineered specialized systems for chess and
>>>>Jeopardy, one could engineer a special system for IQ tests...
>>>>
>>>>For example, with rather modest effort, this group engineered a system
>>>>that does well on specific portions of the standard IQ test
>>>>
>>>>http://www.kurzweilai.net/computer-programs-that-ace-iq-tests
>>>>
>>>>I believe a similar approach could be taken to each of the other
>>>>portions of the IQ test.... Putting them together, one would then
>>>>have a high-IQ AI system -- without much capability to do anything
>>>>else...
>>>>
>>>>Thetests used to measure intelligence of preschoolers are a bit more
>>>>interesting to me, in the sense that they tend to involve intelligent
>>>>engagement in the world, which is harder to "fake"...
>>>>
>>>>The bottom line is, though, IQ tests are moderately effective for
>>>>humans because they are designed to exploit particular features of the
>>>>human mind. It's hard for humans to pass IQ questions without being
>>>>pretty generally intelligent, but the same wouldn't necessarily be
>>>>truefor AI minds...
>>>>
>>>>Ben
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Jeffrey Epstein
>>>><jeevacation@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=229ehewjduk
>>>>>
>>>>>-
>>>>>******************** ***********
>>>>>The information contained in this communication is
>>>>>confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
>>>>>constitute inside information, and is intended only for
>>>>>the use of the addressee. It is the property of
>>>>>Jeffrey Epstein
>>>>>Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
>>>>>communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
>>>>>and may be unlawful. If you have received this
>>>>>communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>>>>>return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
>>>>>destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
>>>>>including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ben Goertzel, PhD

EFTA00953911

http://goertzel.org

"My humanity is a constant self-overcoming" -- Friedrich Nietzsche >>> >>> >>> >>> ****** ******* >>> The information contained in this communication is >>> confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may >>> constitute inside information, and is intended only for >>> the use of the addressee. It is the property of >>> Jeffrey Epstein >>> Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this >>> communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited >>> and may be unlawful. If you have received this >>> communication in error, please notify us immediately by >>> return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and >>> destroy this communication and all copies thereof, >>> including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Ben Goertzel, PhD

http://goertzel.org

"My humanity is a constant self-overcoming" -- Friedrich Nietzsche


The information contained in this communication is > confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may > constitute inside information, and is intended only for > the use of the addressee. It is the property of > Jeffrey Epstein > Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this > communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited > and may be unlawful. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify us immediately by > return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and > destroy this communication and all copies thereof, > including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

EFTA00953912

"My humanity is a constant self-overcoming" -- Friedrich Nietzsche



The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

EFTA00953913

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV