Re: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Darren Please Call me after you read the attached emails between [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] Jeffrey we can talk about their content tomorrow.

scott great work. I am very troubled by the things you have found. and have been previouly overlooked. not sure how we have brad to casell emails. there must be more. darren , if we need more reveiw help should we get [REDACTED] or someone else involved. we need a thorough review of emails. this is NUTs it also has professor cassell talking about his 4 percent and shooting his wad, -------- Forwarded message ---------

Not sure how the prior law firm would have received these emails but they surely have a chain of custody, a disc from which they were printed, others before/after. You don't want [REDACTED] to be able to say they were inadvertently disclosed and must be returned i.e. inadmissible which is a lawyer's first move when his emails/work product were disseminated. Seems different than the Rothstein emails which may have come from a separate discovery production. Not to in anyway discourage a pretrial proactive approach, but together they are most devastating if [REDACTED] (not dreaming you have them) first denies the content and then is confronted with his own writings – last night/today's .

maybe alan releases to the press.? dont want to wait until trial. . another summary judgement motion. ? at the same time release to the press. in FULL.

I don't know all the ins/outs, strategy re current case but my defaults would be to rely on a pleading not an indirect press release and to prioritize using in the case before you in the most effective way you can Around in AM if you want to discuss.

i dont want to go to trial. . i think that if the judge saw this hed go crazy

Again, I have no context so just taking a stab but this could warrant habeas on Rothstein, maybe others connected to that investigation, continuance to reopen discovery, redepose , open door to different defenses via pretrial motions in limine etc. Whether it fits into the legal issues for a SJ motion is something Scott could advise.