Re: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Darren Please Call me after you read the attached emails between Brad and Paul. Jeffrey we can talk about their content tomorrow.

scott great work. I am very troubled by the things you have found. and have been previsouly overlooked. not sure how we have brad to casell emails. there must be more. darren, if we need more reveiw help should we get jessica or someone else involved. we need a thorough review of emails. this is NUTS it also has professor cassell talking about his 4 percent and shooting his wad,

Not sure how the prior law firm would have received these emails but they surely have a chain of custody, a disc from which they were printed, others before/after. You don't want to be able to say they were inadvertently disclosed and must be returned i.e. inadmissible which is a lawyer's first move when his emails/work product were disseminated. Seems different than the Rothstein emails which may have come from a separate discovery production. Not to in anyway discourage a pretrial proactive approach, but together they are most devastating if not dreaming you have them) first denies the content and then is confronted with his own writings — last nig o ay's .

maybe alan releases to the press.? dont want to wait until trial. . another summary judgement motion. ? at the same time release to the press. in FULL.

I don't know all the ins/outs, strategy re current case but my defaults would be to rely on a pleading not an indirect press release and to prioritize using in the case before you in the most effective way you can Around in AM if you want to discuss.

i dont want to go to trial. . i think that if the judge saw this hed go crazy

Think of the best pretrial motion that this relates to; too many risks going anywhere else with it. Once filed, its available in other cases.