Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Who are they?

my friend upon hearing the evidence that [REDACTED] is lying said ". Jeffrey , you're being silly, every thinking person knows she is lying but you have to admit it's fun to watch. Royals sex money celebrity. How can you not watch". Let's deal with it with a legal motion and I strongly suggest a halt in trying to manage . It merely contributes to the theater. Thanks

Kendall Coffey is Alan's attorney, former federal judge, US Atty Tom Scott the lawyer/expert

Letter to usao?

I have no advanced knowledge as to this afternoon's agenda but would expect they would want some history on the NPA, Jane Doe #102 lawsuit, the investigation, the CVRA, A letter from them to USAO has no downsides. A filing from them on Alan's behalf in the CVRA is also something they are considering. It may or more likely may not get traction with J Marra (see his attached order on Reinhart) but it would at least put before your judge Alan's strong denials and, as important, a distancing of Alan from the NPA, its immunity provisions, any conflicts of interest etc as well as containing an expected strong criticism of the gratuitous including of a detailed uncorroborated accusation when it was immaterial to the joinder issue. Hopefully the Govt will raise lathes, delay as a reason to exclude VR as JD 3. If you have strong views on whether such a motion should/should not be filed let me know before the call.