Re: Attorney client

it should also put to bed the argument that we conspired with her

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Martin Weinberg < > wrote:

This confirms a lot of our assumptions about federal overreach and about how close they were to indicting as we exercised your appeal options in dc

Will need to think through how it all can be used to help

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 23, 2015, at 9:51 AM, "jeffrey E." jeevacation@gmail.com wrote:

pretty wild. she lays out details in the subjects so that counsel can see a summary, clever. lots of new info contained.

she tried to make sure no work release way before i was even in jail. . she was moving forward trying to indict me when case was under review in wash. . she organized pro bono counsel for girls. there is talk about a search warrant. ? in 07 not sure if it relates to state.? it shows that she was tlaking to ceos way before acosta gave it to them for de novo review?? ,

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Martin Weinberg < > wrote:
As filed this AM

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

This image is an email header. The key information is:

From: Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
Date: June 23, 2015, 9:22:57 AM EDT
To: Martin G. Weinberg
Subject: Privilege Log
Reply-To: Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.

Attached is the Privilege Log filed this morning in the CVRA case.

please note

EFTA00853581

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

EFTA00853582