Re: [MoM] Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Paper - A New Photon Model Resolves Current Physics & Cosmology Paradoxes
Dear Stan, George, Avtar and particularly Vinod,
Thank you very much for your kindest correspondence regarding the concept of energy. Indeed energy can mean several different concepts within physics, all relating to the physical accepted concepts of nature and its interactions. In relativistic physics we encounter E = mc^2, in quantum theory, E = h*nu, in classical mechanics, we think of potential and kinetic energy etc., and in chemical physics we can allude to the idea of zero point energy; in condensed matter, zero point motion and forth come coherent states or matter as a representation basis; in cosmology extensions can be made for the energy of the vacuum, false vacuum
EFTA00843467
(depending on meta-stability), the idea of a cosmological constant (in the Einstein Field Equations, EFE ) as a representation of the energy density of the vacuum and its association of zero point energy in matter fields (via harmonic representation etc. ).
The main point is that we have many different descriptions for the 'concept' of energy, and similarly speaking for zero point energy, its regime of operability and discrepancies between observed and theoretical values. We seem to 'feel' comforted by the various existing definitions because those have provided great success in our day to day living from riding our cars to work, riding airplanes from one continent to another, as well as carrying operational vehicles in space, needless to mention the day to day technology with which we live from cell phones, televisions to computers etc..
At the same time, believing that we have neared a conclusive or even comprehensive understanding of energy would ultimately be quite a false premise and stand. Such stance could mean that, in a large scale, we have solved our problem between quantum mechanics and general relativity, that we can easily traverse from the EFE back to the Schrodinger equation by shrinking scales (disregarding specialized stress energy tensors..), that force fields and our understanding of localizable points of matter are always simple mathematical extensions of one another. The point is that conclusively speaking, the concept of energy is far from being a well established constant, but varies from scale to scale from which a universal frame only exists as an epistemic understanding and not ontological in nature.
I believe that it is worth going back to Bohr's argument of inseparability as a source for understanding that observations are not ascribed to the objects of measurement or the devices of measurement but to the interaction between the agency of observation along with the above. Thus, maybe we can take a look at energy as an interaction term, not just with the object of observation, the measurement of observation but also make an inclusive point of including the observer. Maybe, the reason why we have, otherwise known as 'deterministic' laws in physics (i.e. apparently observer independent), is because 'somehow' the observer cancels out, within certain yet un-parametrized equations, or that in some long range unknown limit, the observer for all practical purposes, corresponds to higher orders of accuracy, and our 'current laws' are only a first order approximation to a greater, more encompassing theory where 'process' and 'interaction' take the place of our current object oriented science which, by its formalism, accentuates the apparent divide between object - subject.
Therefore, concepts of PK, of associated altered states of consciousness whereby matter can be affected, or through which sequences of events can be influenced correspond to a deeper interaction between the 'Mind' of the observer, and a primary constituent of matter, or matter fields.
Possibly, such interaction takes place at the level of zero point energy, zpe, which is also a vastly complex and varying subject within the various scales of operation - from cosmology, to condensed matter systems, to physical chemistry. Just one water molecule is believed to contain above 20 *K_bT of energy at room temperature, there are in the order of 10^25 molecules of water in just one liter, gather just a few liters of water and there is close approximation of a solar flare in a portion of your house swimming pool - only if we could access it!
The ample and inaccessible aspect of zpe has created a association, within spiritual traditions, between ordinary states of perception and altered states of mind. ZPE has been utilized to depict or point at heightened states of awareness, which, contrary to the word 'heightened' only occur when physically the meditator enters a deeply relaxed state. The sensation is as if 'falling deeper within', relaxing within to a place intensely quiet and incredibly active - (a concept nearly foreign in the west 'deeply relaxed while deeply aware, awake'). At the same time, it is also not be confused with the fuzz, and buzz of the city, but metaphorically speaking, the meditator's state is to be more correctly associated with the underlying field upon which all the fuzz and buzz reside. Within this deeper state, much of PK and other related paranormal phenomena can be accessed, operated, and, to a degree manipulated at will by the adept practioner.
But, so it is, that in wisdom traditions, these states are highly 'hidden' and deeply dwelling within the
EFTA00843468
consciousness of the individual; in part for protection of the one practicing and for those around. Once, accessed, the initiate holds a great deal of responsibility and a powerful, surrendering aspect, of a great expansive sense of a Unified Self or expansive awareness ; which stands in opposition, or as a contrary existence, to what is generally experienced (in western traditions) as the contracting phenomena of deep self identification or ego.
As in so far as physics, chemistry and mathematics hold within their intrinsic primary object of formulation, dynamics or manipulation as explanatory models for 'what is observed' in the natural world, the existence of Platonic forms; and, as in so, far those Platonic forms have their origins in the metaphysical; one can arrive at an understanding whereby all concepts, and formulations currently existent within the natural sciences are ultimately but symbols and pointers to a greater reality, one that is most easily accessed within the subjective experience of the Self, of the ultimate union between Spirit and Universal Energy or the Divine.
With much affection and gratitude to All,
Best,
Karla
Karla
Appreciate your comment that scientific formulations concepts and facts are symbolic representations of an unbounded reality with inseparability of all existence
That which we call mind brain body universe are human constructs for our species specific mode of knowing and experience . The species as a biological organism is also a human construct .
We are not a biological organism but a species of consciousness .
Would you agree ?
Deepak Chopra MD
[Redacted]
Chopra Foundation
Jiyo
Chopra Center for Wellbeing
www.discoveringyourcosmicself.com
1486494082887_email-signature-order.jpg
