Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right Re: Clock synchronisation, Relativity, Retrocausality and the Paranormal
arrow_back

Re: Clock synchronisation, Relativity, Retrocausality and the Paranormal

7 messages picture_as_pdf Source PDF
R
Remi Cornwall Aug 4, 2016 4:12 PM
To
Michelle Kathryn McGee

Yes of course but how are the measurements communicated?

Say you have a box coupled electromagnetically to whatever its measuring and sending signals to control, how does the box communicate with the controller several miles away. By radio, yes, correct. What if the control communicates to the box by a quantum channel sending classical data with the measure/no-measure protocol**?

At the bottom of it, relativity is all about metrology/horology. You're communicating time and length standards.

Lets look at a time standard (limit to SR). The usual thing is clocks in a frame are moved from the origin very slowly to their destinations in the frame. They ping off the seconds and a record of their time and we can say, although they all keep the same rate of time, the distant ones are retarded or delayed as we read their times pinging every second back at the origin. We know full well that this is just the transit time but it is verboten to speak of distant observers having the same instant of time as oneself. This is the failure of simultaneity in time.

What if now we communicate our clock standard by a quantum channel and the collapse protocol (discernable by an interferometer, 0: no measurement, 1: measurement••)? We know that the collapse is instantaneous (lets not argue that, it's been measured, at least retrospectively" ). We'd have simultaneity.

Now we can compare putative retrocausal effects against this gold standard of simultaneity as, at least in one frame, we can say we have an absolute tick of the clock. To be truly retrocausal, with this time standard, I would need some phenomena where: variable = f( t1, t2, variable, d variable/dt, d this that/dt etc.) and not merely have some retarded time term r = t - r/c because our gold standard quantum channel synchronised clocks would catch this (ha ha, light is "slow").

And it just may be... a gifted psychic person gets into a trance in a laboratory (today) and says, "lets all not meet here next week because the security guard goes mad at 11.30 Friday and kills us all" (and he does turns up next week and has no-one to kill, as predicted and avoided). That would be truly retrocausal. The effect from next week just pops into that locale (that point in space and absolute time) and his head with no discernable causality (no wave equation no chugging of things through space-time, totally discontinuous).

In fact the sine qua non of a retrocausal effect could only be this discontinuous generation of events on a space-time diagram and the retrospective cognizance (or correlation) that it was connected to a future event WITH the absolute quantum channel time standard.

Note, this rules out the "magic" of entanglement collapse as retrocausal, as we have gotten over this little miracle and now use it as technology for our clock standards. Ergo, retrocausal is something else beyond this.

** http://webspace.qmul.ac.uk/rocornwall/Flyer_QSE1.gif and http://webspace.qmul.ac.uk/roc
ornwall/QSE_Bona-fide.JPG

a.* Zbinden, H.; Gisin, N., et el, *Testing the speed of 'spooky action at a distance'. Nature. 2008. 454

<MKMcGeeCosmos&History_Aug2016_working.docx>

please note

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

D
Deepak Chopra Aug 4, 2016 10:42 PM
To
Jack Sarfatti

Jack --we are all fictional characters in a cosmic dream -not even a sneeze or fart in cosmic time --time itself an illusion .

2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92009
The Chopra Foundation

Super Genes: Unlock the Astonishing Power of Your DNA for Optimum Health and Wellbeing

J
Jack Sarfatti Aug 5, 2016 1:38 AM
To
Deepak Chopra
Cc
Michelle Kathryn McGeeShelli JoyeBrian JosephsonCynthia Sue LarsonJim JohnstonC LanganPaul ZielinskiLeanne WhitneyDeepak Chopraart wagnerJohn HorganDavid KaiserStanley A. KLEINRudy TanziHenry P. StappStuart R - (hameroff) HameroffJagdish MannKim BurrafatoRussell TargJoseph FirmageErhardWernercreon levitnick herbertSaul-Paul SiragGeorge JohnsonJohn AlexanderRobert AddinallAnte LaucGary S Bekkum

Einstein called it a stubbornly persistent illusion.

Sent from my iPad

D
Deepak Chopra Aug 5, 2016 2:26 AM
To
Jack Sarfatti
Cc
Deepak ChopraMichelle Kathryn McGeeShelli JoyeBrian JosephsonCynthia Sue LarsonC LanganJim JohnstonPaul Zielinski

He comes around nastily

Deepak Chopra
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92009

Super Genes: Unlock the Astonishing Power of Your DNAfor Optimum Health and Wellbeing

M
Michelle Kathryn McGee Aug 5, 2016 3:09 AM
To
Remi Cornwall

Remi,

It has been a dream of mine to make the acquaintance of a capable and open-minded physicist who would review my work. Feel free to delve as you wish. Any and all feedback is welcome. I have met

physicists over the years but none are willing to examine anything beyond the abstract. A good old fashioned Mexican stand-offl

I am currently preparing a paper for Cosmos & History, the philosophy journal where the Foundation of Mind conference proceedings go. A late draft is attached. The title is "Notes from the existential underground: the universe as a complex emergent system."

In it, I refer to Chris Langan's work from 2002 (CTMU) and my own from 2003 (Novel View): Implications of a novel view of the cosmological energy density and pressure relationship (Academia.edu link)

Your daring sensibility in deconstructing Jack's pet retrocausality has been a pleasure to read. Many great teaching/learning points and connections.

Regards,
michelle

D
Deepak Chopra Aug 5, 2016 11:32 AM
To
jeevacation@gmail.com

I've met Paul Selig I'd like to know your experience

Deepak Chopra
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92009

Super Genes: Unlock the Astonishing Power of Your DNAfor Optimum Health and Wellbeing

J
Jeffrey E. Aug 5, 2016 11:56 AM
To
Deepak Chopra
  • i did like the fart in cosmic time. . it appears we know the same woman. :)

  • fyl my concisouness guys are bringing around an empath called paul selig at noon. im going to push the woo envelope.

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV