Re: FW: Fortress VRF I LLC v. Jeepers, JAMS No. 1425006537

Dear Judge Carpinello:

Please see the attached letter, which is also being delivered by hand to .IAMS's offices this afternoon.

Respectfully,

EFTA00654519

Daniel E. Reynolds

Daniel E. Reynolds
Lankler Siffert & Wohl LLP
500 Fifth Avenue, 33rd Floor
(t)
(f)

This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive this message), you may not use, copy, or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message.

If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender hv reply e-mail or contact Lankler Siffert & Wohl LLP at and delete the message.

Thank you.

Forwarded Message: From: Harry Susman Date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:56 PM Subject: FW: Fortress VRF I LLC v. Jeepers, JAMS No. 1425006537 To: Bill Dunseth, Darren Indyke, Jeff Epstein, "Jonathan J. Ross", Steve Susman, Jill McCrary, Seth Ard, Harry Susman

Well, I suppose this accomplishes their purpose of poisoning the well.

Its a blatantly disingenuous letter suggesting that you settled civil cases to silence witnesses even though almost all the complainants were on a list of witnesses who the Govt promised would not be the subject of any prosecution in an NPA signed and finalized prior (not after) the civil settlements. It also fails to recognize that the letters cannot be used against you in any civil proceeding (FRE 410) and the settlements should not be used against you to prove anything relevant to your current litigation (FRE 408). Investigation by your counsel - and, of course, there was no investigation of prosecutors in order to disqualify them - is subject to atty-client and work product.