Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right Phone call info
arrow_back

Phone call info

21 messages picture_as_pdf Source PDF
[
[Redacted]. (USAFS) Feb 12, 2008 3:19 PM

Hi – I am trying to get this indictment package finalized. Can you e-mail to me the final telephone charts for all of the girls and , , and ? Also, do you have all of records electronically? Maybe we can search for phone numbers for some of the new girls, even though we don’t have their phone records yet.

Also, can you check on the lead to New York? Ideally, I would like to turn the package in on Thursday, so I need to know if we can include any of those girls.

When you have a chance, please give me a call. I am in the U.S. Attorney's Office –

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1717
08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014618

EFTA00224591

(
(USAFLS) Feb 12, 2008 4:33 PM
To
Dr. Bard

Can you e-mail me your summary chart, too? The Excel spreadsheet.

Thanks.
Assistant U.S. Attorney

1713

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014616

EFTA00224590

[
[Redacted]. (USAFS) Feb 14, 2008 11:41 AM

FYI — Tell me what you think. Also, can you pull the messages from and see ifyou can tell what the dates are and who took the messages? Thanks.

And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with ' 4/23/04 and 5/2/04

Assistant U.S. Attorney

From: (USAFLS)

Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:22 AM

To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment

Hi — Our server was down for a few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. 1 wanted to talk about which girls we should drop.

[ ] and [ ] . are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.

With respect to the other girls brought by [ ] , here are my thoughts. We can drop and very easily.
Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. is a good witness because she shows that, if
you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems
like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice.

I think we should drop [REDACTED]. because I don’t believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as “a virgin on graduation day.”)

That only leaves the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth keeping. We have such good documentary evidence related to her - message pads, car rental records, 156 calls with and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with so this is key).

What do you think?

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1702

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014613

EFTA00224589

[
[Redacted]. (USAFS) Feb 14, 2008 12:37 PM

I'm not supposed to be involved in any substantive decisions until I get word from "on high". However, my general thoughts are that you are correct. has some of the best evidence and will be a good witness, although a reluctant one. Am I correct to assume that and A. are still in? Their past history of commitment will have to be dealt with and it won't be easy, but I agree that they should be left in. The fact that their commitments were post-Epstein is good, but his attorneys are going to try to destroy them. Is in as well? I thought that she was truthful. What about

From: [REDACTED]. (USAFLS) [mailto[REDACTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: Epstein Indictment

iii — Our server was down for a few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk about which girls weshould drop.

[ ]

and . are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.

With respect to the other girls brought by , here arc my thoughts. We can dro and [ ]
very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. . is a good wt ness
because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops t e massage and doesn't
want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative
nature outweighs its prejudice.

I think we should drop . because I don't believe she will ever be completelytruthful about the amount of sexual activity that occurre . (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as "a virgin on graduation day.")

That only leaves [ ] , the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth
keeping We have such good documentary evidence related to her - message pads, car rental records, 156 calls
with and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with , so this is
key).

What do you think?

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1690

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014612

EFTA00224588

(
(USAFLS) Feb 14, 2008 1:00 PM
To
(USAFLS)

Hey

[ ]

There was no indictment attached to your email. Can you send it again.

In addition to the two calls from to on her cell phone 4/23/04 at 1:35 pm and 5/2/04 at 10:32 am, we have two telephone calls from to boyfriend) telephone on 03/04/2004 at 9:46 am and 2:30 pm.

Message pads reflect 10 niss from beginning 03/11/2003 ending 03/01/2006. Individuals Identified as taking the messages are Michael, Louella, and Alfredo Rodriguez.

From: [REDACTED]. (USAFLS) [REDACTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:41 AM
To: [REDACTED]; [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Epstein Indictment

FYI - Tell me what you think. Also. can you pull the messages from and see if you can tell what the dates are and who took the messages? Thanks. And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with M? 4/23/04 and 5/2/04

Assistant U.S. Attorney

From: (USAFLS)
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment
Hi -Our server was down for a few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted
to talk about which girls we should drop.
and are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought by ,here are my thoughts. We can drop [ ] and
very easily. Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. is a good witness
because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't
want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative
nature outweighs its prejudice.
I think we should drop because I don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of
sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as "a virgin on graduation
day.")
That only leaves [ ] the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth
keeping. We have such good documentary evidence related to her - message pads, car rental records, 156 calls

1686

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014610

EFTA00224586

with [redacted], and 2 calls with
key).
What do you think?
[redacted]
Assistant U.S. Attorney

(we have very few phone calls with

so this is

1687

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014611

EFTA00224587

(
(USAFLS) Feb 14, 2008 1:21 PM
To
Eli Jason

I didn't send the indictment yet. I was just asking for input on who to include and who to exclude.

How old was when she went with

Assistant U.S. Attorney

From:
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 1:00 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: RE: Epstein Indictment

Hey

There was no indictment attached to your email. Can you send it again.

In addition to the two calls from to on her cell phone 4/23/04 at 1:35 pm and 5/2/04 at 10:32 am, we have two telephone calls from to oyfriend) telephone on 03/04/2004 at 9:46 am and 2:30 pm.

Message pads reflect 10 messages from Il beginning 03/11/2003 ending 03/01/2006. Individuals Identified as taking the messages are Evelyne, Michae, Loue la, and Alfredo Rodriguez.

From: [REDACTED]. (USAFLS) [REDACTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:41 AM
To: [REDACTED]; [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Epstein Indictment

FYI — Tell me what you think. Also. can you pull the messages from and see if you can tell what the dates arc and who took the messages? Thanks. And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with ? 4/23/04 and 5/2/04

Assistant U.S. Attorney

From: . (USAFLS)
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment

1678
08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014608

Hi – Our server was down for a few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk about which girls we should drop.
and , are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.
With respect to the other girls brought by , here are my thoughts. We can drop and . very easily. Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. is a good witness because she shows that, if you aren’t willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn’t want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice.
I think we should drop , because I don’t believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as “a virgin on graduation day.”)
That only leaves , the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth keeping. We have such good documentary evidence related to her – message pads, car rental records, 156 calls with , and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with , so this is key).
What do you think?

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1679

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014609

EFTA00224585

[
[Redacted]. (USAFS) Feb 14, 2008 1:35 PM

Hi guys — sorry to bother you. On some of the new girls I don't have dabs.

The image contains text and blacked-out sections. The visible text reads: "Have you guys ever talked to or ? Should I include them?". The blacked-out sections obscure names or entities that the question refers to.

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1674

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014607

EFTA00224583

[
[Redacted]. (USAFS) Feb 14, 2008 2:39 PM

I always seem to notice something new when I go through these records. In Janusz's notes, he shows a payment to Golden Cab on 6/17/05. Can you call and see if they have any records or any trips tosEl Brillo Way? Or a Dennis working there? And that long string of unknown numbers on Sarah's cell phone. Could those be a group of lines for Yellow Cab?

Thanks.

I am almost finished with the changes to the girls we are keeping. I will send that to you and then when I finish the new girls, I will send that portion.

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1670

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014605

EFTA00224582

(
(USAFLS) Feb 14, 2008 3:13 PM

I am having a really hard time e-mailing you guys. My e-mails are getting bounced back so I have to re-send numerous times until it goes through. Do you know if there is something wrong with the FBI's server?

Assistant U.S. Attorney

-----Original Message-----
From: . (USAFLS)
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:11 PM
To: .
Subject: RE: List of names

Assistant U.S. Attorney

-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:10 PM
To: . (USAFLS)
Subject: Re: List of names
??? NYC or d.

----- Original Message
From: (USAFLS)
To: ;
Sent: Thu Feb 14 14:57:31 2008
Subject: RE: List of names

From: (USAFLS)
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 1:43 PM
To: .;
Subject: List of names

Here are the names of people I am intending to keep in the indictment: 1660

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014600

Not all will be in substantive counts, but they will be mentioned in the overt acts.

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1661

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014601

EFTA00224581

[
[Redacted]. (USAFS) Feb 14, 2008 5:29 PM

Hi guys — Here is the most recent draft. I have only looked at the overt acts sections for the girls we are keeping. Can you go through those and ch ti• li• I c facts? Also, can you figure out which trips we can drop from the overt acts? I think I only have 2 phone calls from, so if there are some calls I can add, please point those out, too.

I will turn to the new girls tomorrow.

Thanks.

[x]

080214 revised
IndIctmen .pdf

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1658

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014599

EFTA00224579

[
[Redacted]. (USAFS) Feb 15, 2008 10:10 AM

Did you ever talk to .?

Do we have any time frame, messages, or phone calls for 7

Thanks.

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1654

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014598

EFTA00224578

(
(USAFLS) Feb 15, 2008 10:31 AM

It isn’t in the 302. And did she explain what happened during that first massage with Epstein?

Thanks.

[Redacted]
Assistant U.S. Attorney
[Redacted]

1650

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014597

EFTA00224577

(
(USAFLS) Feb 15, 2008 11:20 AM

I thought I had a complete set of the message pads here, but I only have the copies of the messages that have identified girls' names. Can you look through the message pads and tell me what the ones from say?

Thank you (so sorry)

Assistant U.S. Attorney

-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 10:36 AM
To: . (USAFLS)
Subject: Re: I am back with more questions

Only pbpd spoke with (She was 18 @ the time) but we will interview her and I think she will be cooperative. We dont have time frame for and went betwn 10/03-05/04. last visit.

----- Original Message ------
From: . (USAFLS) <
To: . ;
Sent: Fri Feb 15 10:10:14 2008
Subject: RE: I am back with more questions

Did you ever talk to .

Do we have any time frame, messages, or phone calls for .?

Thanks.

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1644

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014594

EFTA00224576

(
(USAFLS) Feb 15, 2008 11:48 AM
To
V (USAFS)

only 1 message no date possible 05/05

----- Original Message ------
From: V (USAFLS) <
To:
Sent: Fri Feb 15 11:06:06 2008
Subject: RE: I am back with more questions

What is phone number? Thanks.

Assistant U.S. Attorney

-----Original Message-----
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 10:36 AM
To: [Redacted]. (USAFLS)
Subject: Re: I am back with more questions

Only pbpd spoke with [REDACTED]. (She was 18 @ the time) but we will interview her and I think she will be cooperative. We dont have time frame for [REDACTED], [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] went betwn 10/03-05/04. [REDACTED] last visit.

----- Original Message ------
From: . (USAFLS) <
To: ;
Sent: Fri Feb 15 10:10:14 2008
Subject: RE: I am back with more questions

Did you ever talk to ?.
Do we have any time frame, messages, or phone calls for ?.

Do we have any time frame, messages, or phone calls for ?.?
Thanks.

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1642

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014593

EFTA00224575

(
(USAFLS) Feb 15, 2008 1:08 PM

Thanks.

[Redacted]
Assistant U.S. Attorney

1636

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014590

EFTA00224574

(
(USAFLS) Feb 15, 2008 1:38 PM

Hi – I read statement. She says she first went with and between January and May of her senior year.

She says on the second visit she went with ., ., and . This is weird because . says she went with .
She says on the third visit, she went with ., ., and .

Assuming . is correct about the order of visits and that.. was with them on that trip, we are looking around July [x]
2004 (because called E. in July 2004).

Is it safe to say that these events took place In or around the first half of 2004?

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1635

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014589

EFTA00224573

(
(USAFLS) Feb 15, 2008 4:50 PM

Thank you so much! Have a good weekend. I am headed out now, but will work on this at home. Assistant U.S. Attorney From: Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 4:48 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: High Schools

  • A person stated that both they and themselves were attending their 11th grade year (both girls born in 1987).
  • A person believes they may have started going to their 10th grade year.
  • Information related to attending high school grade levels and who took the photos/went with individuals is redacted.

1632
08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014588

EFTA00224572

(
(USAFLS) Feb 15, 2008 8:55 PM
To
(USAFLS)

fa I just recvd about 5 emails from you. I do not have my books here. I will look at things first thing tues and answer whatever we did not already talk about. We did hear back from amazon and they would like cc info, Jason will work with them next week. Sorry I did not get your emails sooner.

Original Message
From: (USAFLS)
To:
Sent: Fri Feb 15 12:56:16 2008
Subject: RE: I am back with more questions

Hi -- Just one more question, I hope. Where did [redacted] go to school?
They both say they went to the same school, but one says [blacked out] and the other says [blacked out]. And do you know what year(s) they graduated?

Thanks.

Assistant U.S. Attorney

-----Original Message-
From:
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 10:36 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: Re: I am back with more questions

Only pbpd spoke with [x] (She was 18 @ the time) but we will interview her and I think she will be cooperative. We dont have time frame for [x] [x] and [x] went betwn 10/03-05/04. [x] last visit.

----- Original Message ------
From: . (USAFLS) <
To: .;
Sent: Fri Feb 15 10:10:14 2008
Subject: RE: I am back with more questions

Did you ever talk to .?

Do we have any time frame, messages, or phone calls for .? Thanks.

1626

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014585

EFTA00224570

(
(USAFLS) Feb 19, 2008 2:03 PM

Hope you had a great weekend.

Well it has not been easy and I dont know If you can make any sense of It.

Facts:
and had contact 9 times between (7/15/2004 - 10/26/2004)
and had contact 1 time (10/26/2004) This is appears to be father's phone. We believe we have cellphone at the time and no calls with

Testimony:

[Redacted] brought) stated Spring of her Junior year. (Estimated to be Spring 2004)
[Redacted] and [Redacted] stated sophomore year - ( this time line does not fit at all) [ ] and [ ] both estimated to be Sophomores 02-03

stated she went between January and May of Senior year which is believed to be Jan - May 2005. She turned 18 in Feb 2005. 1 do not know if she was being truthful about the time of the year or If she was more concerned about when she turned 18.

SOooooowho knows....

Born In [ ]
MI aduated from
graduated from

1624

08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014584

EFTA00224569

(
(USAFLS) Feb 22, 2008 12:07 PM

[Redacted] last name is [Redacted] or [Redacted] and her phone number is [Redacted] (this may be an office number, not a cell phone number). They also show another corporate name: “[Redacted].”

They show a phone number for Epstein and Eric Gany as

They have an e-mail address for as: and show her phone number as

The notes show that the credit card was declined and then they show at , with company name ‘

They want us to be more specific about individual shipment records, so we will have to comb through what they gave us to identify specific shipments.

I am running to lunch but will be back this afternoon.

Thanks.

Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax

1567
08-80736-CV-MARRA

P-014622

EFTA00224568

(
(USAFLS) Feb 22, 2008 2:07 PM

Hi - Can you e-mail or fax me the dates of the calls? I can add them to the indictment today. I think [ ] Karen is going to try to finish her review over the weekend.

Thanks.

Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax

1564
08-80736-CV-MARRA

EXHIBIT B-110

P-014621

EFTA00224567

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV