Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right RE: CVRA case
arrow_back

RE: CVRA case

3 messages picture_as_pdf Source PDF
P
Paul Cassell Oct 12, 2010 3:47 PM
To
(USAFLS)
Cc
Brad Edwards

Hi if I may), [ ]

I believe we have communicated electronically before. As you probably know, I am co-counsel with Brad Edwards on the CVRA case concerning the Epstein (non) prosecution.

You will have seen Judge Marra's order today asking for us to explain the current situation on the CVRA case by October 23. By October 23, we plan to file a motion asking the court to declare that there were violations of the CVRA. We will be doing that on the basis of a set of fact in the case, of course.

I am writing to see if you would be interested in working with us on a stipulated set of facts? We will be in a position to give you a set of facts early to middle of next week. Would you be able to look at them quickly and let us know which facts are not dispute?

Thanks in advance for your cooperation on narrowing the factual issues in this case and any idea for helping the case to progress smoothly.

EFTA00212627

Sincerely,

Paul Cassell

Counsel for Jane Does

Paul G. Cassell

Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law

S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

(
(USAFLS) Oct 12, 2010 3:58 PM
To
(USAFLS)

This is plaintiffs' response to the order to show cause.

(
(USAFLS) Oct 12, 2010 8:23 PM
To
'

From: (USAFLS)
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 3:58 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: FW: CVRA case

This is plaintiffs' response to the order to show cause.

From: Paul Cassell [mailto:
Sent: Tuesda October 12, 2010 3:47 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Cc: Brad Edwards
Subject: CVRA case

Hi if I may), [ ]

I believe we have communicated electronically before. As you probably know, I am co-counsel with Brad Edwards on the CVRA case concerning the Epstein (non) prosecution.

You will have seen Judge Marra's order today asking for us to explain the current situation on the CVRA case by October 23. By October 23, we plan to file a motion asking the court to declare that there were violations of the CVRA. We will be doing that on the basis of a set of fact in the case, of course.

I am writing to see if you would be interested in working with us on a stipulated set of facts? We will be in a position to give you a set of facts early to middle of next week. Would you be able to look at them quickly and let us know which facts are not dispute?

Thanks in advance for your cooperation on narrowing the factual issues in this case and any idea for helping the case to progress smoothly.

EFTA00212627

Sincerely,

Paul Cassell

Counsel for Jane Does

Paul G. Cassell

Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law

S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

EFTA00212628

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV