Fwd: WSJ follow-up question

G

To

Marlene

Hi Marlene, I'm a reporter at WSJ. I wanted to know if the U.S. Attorney's office in Miami has any comment on the Dec. 30th motion (attached) filed in JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #21 UNITED STATES (9:08-cv-80736), a lawsuit concerning the government's non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. As widely reported, the motion, which asks the court to allow two other women to join the action, includes new allegations against Prince Andrew and Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz.

I can be reached by email or by phone at .

Thanks,
Jacob

Jacob Gershman

M

To

Gershman, Jacob

Hi, Jacob,

Thank you for your inquiry. We do not comment on pending matters.

Best regards and happy new year.

Marlene

G

To

Marlene

Hi Marlene, I'm writing a follow-up post for WSJ's Law Blog looking at the "Jane Doe" lawsuit itself and the arguments put forward by the government and the plaintiffs. I just wanted to check to see if you wanted to include any additional

comment on the merits of the lawsuit. At the moment, I'm just quoting from government briefs outlining its position.

Thanks,
Jacob

Jacob Gershman
Reporter
The Wall Street Journal
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
O:
C: 646-675-4797
Twitter: @jacobsershman

G

To

Marlene

Link to post:
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2015/01/05/behind-epstein-suit-a-tussle-over-due-process-and-victims-rights/

M

To

Gershman, Jacob

Hi, Jacob,

Thank you for your inquiry. We will decline the opportunity to comment as the matter is ongoing.

Best regards,

The provided image is entirely black and contains no discernible chart, data, or key information. Therefore, no data can be extracted in any format.

U

FYI.

The story was also on HLN.

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gershman, Jacob" Jacob.Gershman@wsj.com
Date: January 5, 2015 at 6:13:36 PM EST
Subject: RE: WSJ follow-up question

Link to post:
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2015/01/05/behind-epstein-suit-a-tussle-over-due-process-and-victims-rights/