Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right RE: Extension of time re redaction
arrow_back

RE: Extension of time re redaction

5 messages picture_as_pdf Source PDF
A
Assistant US Attorney Jun 28, 2013 6:41 AM
To
Paul CassellEdwards Brad

Dear Paul and Brad:

Good morning. I am writing to ask if you have any objection to a motion for a short extension of time to comply with Judge Marra's order requiring us to file unredacted pleadings. Some of those have Judge Middlebrooks' sealed order attached and I need to file something with Judge Middlebrooks to avoid getting caught in the crosshairs. I am pretty sure that he is in town, so 5 days should suffice. If it will be longer than that, I will send a follow-up email.

Thank you so much.

P
Paul Cassell Jun 28, 2013 9:38 AM
To
Assistant US Attorney
Cc
Edwards Brad

Hi

We're happy to work with you on this, so we have no objection.

But we were wondering when you would get back to us on our question (emailed to you yesterday morning) regarding the Government's position on Epstein's (frankly unprecedented) attempt to take an interlocutory appeal in the middle of this case. Is the Government going to oppose that effort? We would be very surprised if the Government wanted to set a precedent allowing suspected criminals to take interlocutory appeals in the middle of cases involving criminal proceedings. We'd like to know quickly, because we are filing very soon in opposition to the motion to stay.

Paul and Brad for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2

A
Assistant US Attorney Jun 28, 2013 10:03 AM
To
Paul Cassell
Cc
Edwards Brad

Hi Paul:

Thank you for being so accommodating.

I know you worked up at Main, so I think you know that all appellate decisions are made by appellate attorneys. Dexter is handling getting an answer and will get back to you as soon as he can.

Have a wonderful weekend. I am sure we will talk soon.

EFTA00209799

Assistant US Attorney
Sent from my iPhone

A
Assistant US Attorney Jun 28, 2013 3:50 PM

Have we filed the motion for extension of time?

A
Assistant US Attorney Jun 28, 2013 7:58 PM

Yes. I may be overly optimistic, but I expect to have everything done by Monday (Tuesday at the latest), aside from waiting to address Judge Middlebrooks' sealed order. And I expect that we could finalize things fairly quickly after getting the ruling.

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV