Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right FW: facts to response to Reinhart
arrow_back

FW: facts to response to Reinhart

19 messages picture_as_pdf Source PDF
P
Plagenhoef, Ruth (OPR) Mar 17, 2011 9:44 AM
To
Paul Cassell

Mr. Cassell, I received your voice mail and thought that I should respond by email to be sure you get a timely answer — with the time difference it can be hard to get in touch.

EFTA00205033

I understand from AUSAM that he confirmed to you that he sent your complaint and request for an investigation to OPR. We will therefore consider you a complainant in the matter. Your complaint is being handled within the normal process here at OPR. It has been opened as an inquiry and assigned for review. It is not an investigation.

We will contact you if we need further information and/or to inform you of the results of our review.

Ruth Plagenhoef

Acting Associate Counsel

Office of Professional Responsibility

U.S. Department of Justice

EFTA00205034

P
Plagenhoef, Ruth (OPR) Mar 17, 2011 10:50 AM
To
Paul Cassell

Thanks, Paul.
OPR takes no position regarding any party's representations in litigation.
Ruth

P
Paul Cassell Mar 17, 2011 12:11 PM
To
Plagenhoef, Ruth (OPR)
Cc
Brad Edwards

Hi Ruth,

Thanks for the information.

Tomorrow (3/18) we will be filing a pleading in which we mention AUSA Bruce Reinhart's apparently improper representation of Epstein-related witnesses. I assume that doing so publicly will not compromise your inquiry.

We look forward to hearing from you as a soon as possible about the results of your inquiry. Thanks for your help. Paul Cassell

Paul G. Cassell

Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law
Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

Fax:
Email:
http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=578tname=Cassell Paul

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

P
Plagenhoef, Ruth (OPR) Apr 15, 2011 2:24 PM
To
Paul Cassell
Cc
Brad Edwards

Paul, your complaint is under review. Please note that it is unusual for OPR to initiate an investigation of matters that have been or could be raised in litigation. If we determine based on the record in the pending matter that this is the case, we most likely will decline to go forward. Of course, if a court makes a finding criticizing the government or finding misconduct, the complaint can be renewed, We will let you know the results of our review.

Ruth

P
Plagenhoef, Ruth (OPR) Apr 15, 2011 3:02 PM
To
Paul Cassell

Thanks, Paul. I will pass this on to the Assistant conducting the review.

P
Paul Cassell Apr 15, 2011 3:10 PM
To
Plagenhoef, Ruth (OPR)
Cc
Brad Edwards

Hi Ruth,

I'm just writing to see what the status is regarding the OPR inquiry that has been initiated into the Epstein matter. Brad Edwards and I would like to update our clients.

Also, I am wondering if we can be helpful in providing any information to you in the inquiry. We know a lot about the Epstein matters, and would be happy to pass that along to you.

Thanks in advance for any further information you can provide.

Paul Cassell , Co-Counsel for Jane Doe

Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

EFTA00205032

Fax:
Email:

http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell, Paul

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

P
Paul Cassell Apr 15, 2011 4:57 PM
To
Plagenhoef, Ruth (OPR)
Cc
Brad Edwards

Hi Ruth,

Thanks for getting back to me. I was confused about one point — my letter to U.S. Attorney Ferrer requesting further investigation of the Epstein matter didn't appear to me to raise any issues that even arguably could have been raised in litigation. So I was a bit confused by the reference to that complication in your e-mail — I wasn't sure what you were suggesting might have been the subject of earlier litigation.

Perhaps you were referring to Crime Victims Rights Act issues. As you know, we have raised claims in on-going litigation that the government attorneys violated the Crime Victims Rights Act -- the government attorneys have now responded by arguing that these issues are not properly subject to litigation and the issue is under review by Judge Marra. But we were asking OPR for a general review of the issue of whether improper influences were brought to bear or improper actions taken that led to Epstein receiving a generous "non-prosecution" offer from the U.S. Attorney's Office — a separate subject.

Thanks for keeping us posted. Paul Cassell

EFTA00205031

Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

Email:

http://www.law.utah.eduiprofilesidefault.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell Paul

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

P
Paul Cassell May 3, 2011 12:23 PM
To
Plagenhoef, Ruth (OPR)(USAFLS)
Cc
Brad Edwards

Dear [REDACTED] and Ruth,
As you will have seen, Bruce Reinhard has filed a motion to intervene in our Crime Victims’ Rights Act case.
(Since Ruth has not been served, I attach a copy of the pleading to this e-mail).
As you will see, Reinhard claims that we have no factual basis for making an assertion that (for example)
Reinhard improperly represented [REDACTED] in violation of Justice Department regulations.
In view of this motion, we are writing to inquire into the current status of the Justice Department’s inquiry into
Reinhard’s conduct.

We also believe that the Justice Department has access to information that will support the allegations in our summary judgment motion. We further believe that the Justice Department has access to information that will help us respond to Reinhard's claim that he was not privy to any non-public information about the Epstein case. We are therefore

EFTA00205030

respectfully requesting that the Justice Department provide this information to us by Tuesday, May 10, 2011, so that we can use this information in responding to Reinhard's motion to intervene. Alternatively, if releasing the information at this time will be harmful to the Justice Department's on-going inquiry into Reinhard's conduct, we request that the Justice Department inform Judge Marra that the Reinhard situation is currently the subject of a Justice Department inquiry and that further release of information would be harmful at this time.

We request an opportunity to discuss this matter with you at your earliest convenience. Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Sincerely,

Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell

Co-Counsel for Jane Doe #1and Jane Doe #2

Paul G. Cassell

Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

Email:

http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell, Paul

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

P
Plagenhoef, Ruth (OPR) May 4, 2011 1:28 PM
To
Paul Cassell(USAFLS)
Cc
Brad Edwards

Paul, you will need to talk to about discovery requests. You will be notified of the result of our review of your complaint.
Ruth

P
Paul Cassell May 4, 2011 3:36 PM
To
Plagenhof, Ruth (OPR)(USAFLS)
Cc
Brad Edwards

Ruth – Thanks.
– When can we chat about this? Brad and I are free next Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. Paul

Paul G. Cassell

Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law

S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

Fax:
Email:

http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell, Paul

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

(
(USAFLS) May 10, 2011 8:29 AM
To
Paul Cassell
Cc
Brad Edwards

Paul and Brad,

We can talk today or tomorrow. I am in the office both days. Thanks.

(
(USAFLS) May 10, 2011 9:03 AM
To
Paul Cassell
Cc
Brad Edwards

Paul,
Yes it does. I will be here.

(
(USAFLS) May 10, 2011 9:29 AM
To
Paul Cassell
Cc
Brad Edwards

Paul and Brad,

We can talk today or tomorrow. I am in the office both days. Thanks.

(
(USAFLS) May 10, 2011 10:16 AM
To
Paul Cassell
Cc
Brad Edwards

Paul,

Here it is.

P
Paul Cassell May 10, 2011 11:02 AM
To
(USAFLS)
Cc
Brad Edwards

Thanks - does 4 PM your time work today? Paul

Paul G. Cassell

Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law

S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

Fax:
Email:

http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell, Paul

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

P
Paul Cassell May 10, 2011 11:08 AM
To
(USAFLS)
Cc
Brad Edwards

Great — what number should we call? Paul

EFTA00205028

  • Name: Paul G. Cassell
  • Title: Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law
  • Affiliation: S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah
  • Email: (Redacted)
  • Website: http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell, Paul

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

P
Paul Cassell May 10, 2011 12:04 PM
To
(USAFLS)
Cc
Brad Edwards

Hi

I'm sorry to trouble you with this, but do you by any chance have a pdf copy of the letter Brad and I delivered to US Attorney Ferrer on December 10? I can find a Word copy here, but not the final pdf delivered? If you don't have it close at hand, please don't waste time looking for it. But if it is close it hand, I'd appreciate getting a copy sent back. Thanks for your assistance! Paul

Paul G. Cassell

Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

Email:

http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell, Paul

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

P
Paul Cassell May 10, 2011 3:34 PM
To
(USAFLS)
Cc
Brad Edwards

Dear

Thanks so much for the copy of my(!) letter — secretarial issue here!!

One of the things Brad and I would like to discuss with you is how we should respond to Reinhart's attack on us. Attached is draft statement of facts, that explains some of the reasons why we included the facts about him in our summary judgment motion. We want to discuss with you whether you Office would have any concern about us filing this? Or whether it should be filed under seal? Or whether we should not file it all, relying on other information? We also want to discuss with you what sorts of information Dal is willing and able to give us to respond.

We hope you can look through this before the call. We look forward to chatting soon. Paul

Paul G. Cassell

Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah = hftp://www.law.utah.eduiprofilesidefault.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell Paul

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

(
(USAFLS) May 10, 2011 7:54 PM
To
. (USAFLS)

At 4:00 p.m. today, I am going to be speaking with Paul and Brad about their desire to get information to respond to Bruce Reinhart's motion to intervene and motion for sanctions. They just sent me this draft response that they want to file in response to Reinhart's motion. It references comments you made during the December 10, 2010 meeting with CW, and calls you made to Brad during the weekend of March 19-20, before they filed their motions.

I will see what they want, and contact you later.

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV