Re: Grosof

he is to deny an interview,, he is under no
circumstances to talk to any reporters

--- DKIESQ@aol.com wrote:

David has requested that he be allowed to insist
that information he gives
Vanity Fair must be on an anonymous basis for two
main reasons:

1. Avoid his name becoming known as a contact for

COUQ in the scientific
community, which would, David believes, result in
David having to fend off
unsolicited requests for funding, which would be an
inefficient use of David's
time. In that regard, David pointed out to me that
many granting making
foundations use an anonymous selection committee for
the very purpose of avoiding
unsolicited proposals. For example, the MacArthur
Foundation does this

2. When David interviewed with John Carney of

Deal Breaker. com, Carney,
who was looking for dirt in connection with your
Dalton connection, was left
with the impression, which David did not correct,
that your and David's sole
connection was that from time to time you and he
had informal discussions
about interesting cutting edge scientific topics.
David said that nothing
David told Carney was untrue, but. . . By
identifying David as a rep of COUQ,
David is concerned that Deal Breaker/Carney will be
annoyed that David did not
come completely clean and somehow use this as a
justification for its coverage
to be even more negative about you.

David, therefore, asks if you would mind if he
insist on anonymity if he is
interviewed by Vanity Fair?

Darren K. Indyke
Attorney-At-Law
457 Madison Avenue
4th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Tel: 212-750-1176
Fax: 212-750-0381
e-mail: dkiesq@aol.com (mailto:dkiesq@aol.com)

Confidentiality Notice: This communication and any
attachments contain
information from Darren K. Indyke, Esq. that
constitute attorney work product or
that are otherwise confidential and/or privileged.
Except for personal use by
the intended recipient, or as expressly authorized
by the sender, any person
who receives this information is prohibited from
disclosing, copying,
distributing, and/or using it. If you have received
this communication in error,
please immediately delete it and all copies, and
promptly notify the sender at
the above telephone number or electronic mail
address. Nothing in this
communication is intended to operate as an
electronic signature under applicable
law.

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com