(no subject)

Ken-  I thought this as a working outline ,   I don't mean to put words in your eloquent mouth. -  1 fall on sword for delay of documents    2. you have to LOOK BENEATH the pros memo. when we have been able to do that -the facts have been inaccurately portrayed-. we realize it is cumbersome and burdensome , but necessary for a real  de novo review. the fact that something can be charged , we both know, one can -Always charge, this is not righteous, it has never been the department policy to throw things against the wall and see if  they will stick.. especially in light of the new Supreme Court decisions.  3 POLICY .  SELECTIVITY taking federal law... this is not the policy of the attny general  or the administration , we were told about unitary executive driving this, -not true.   4 MISCONDUCT a threshold issue -we are not seeking to make finding re our  assertions,  from OPR ,we are asking for a de novo review, not by summaries authored
by the same people that have refused to provide us a single heartland issue that fits. the statutes.    MOTIVATION - Selectivity-  intertwined irrefutable,  shocking to those who have reviewed it and /or lived through this.  5- a MEETING  the Issues are both voluminous and filled with complexities.we would like you to fully understand our concerns AFace to face will help narrow those issues. .. We have limited the volume sent to you. but we need to make certain that you have seen the relevant documents, as you know we were precluded from including them in the CEOS presentation.  EXTRA-. I believe Judge Filip would be highly sensitive to the appearances of impropriety. if this were an abuse of discretion review as a judge I know I'd have to recuse myself. ( Alex koszinski) .   

Alex,  we understand wanted to recuse the office. won't take calls-  not involved-  he tried to get Washington to have the authority to modify,     almost anything passes an "abuse of discretion standard",it   is not proper in this case. , because the people  making the decisions are the very the same people , whose conduct we have called into question. we are told they themselves take the complaint seriously enough that  have self reported improper conduct. . how can they stay remain our sole contact  Alex won't take calls , we have been shunted to Marie and Jeff. you have to look at the totality of the circumstances.this from a policy standard , beyond a mere  technical standard, and in light of the recent supreme court decisions that  has instructed us not to bring  a citizen under a novel interpretation of federal law especially where the state is fully capable.of dealing with the conduct  
  Questions to be concerned  IS jon overwhelmed?, would like it to be quick, we ve raised serious new issues Supreme court , statue of limitation , host of misconduct. calls into question the ceracity of the prsc memo.