Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right Re: Fw: John Amerling
arrow_back

Re: Fw: John Amerling

2 messages picture_as_pdf Source PDF
J
J. Epstein Jan 4, 2007 8:04 PM
To
Jack Parker

Jack I just received this this afternoon from Rampino... Please share this with the three that just left as this subject came up before they left.. Good afternoon Darren,

I had a few questions to help my prep as we get started.

First - when is the expected startup date approximately.
my
early discussions with J. Amerling had instructed me to procure 2
additional boats into the Virgin islands for a 1/15/07 start date. now
I bellieve this to be a little optimistic but i need some clarification
.

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker jparker@reed-reed.com
To: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
Cc: Acavanagh@reed-reed.com
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 12:28:00 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: John Amerling

I have forwarded this to art.
He will be re-estimating the entire job so those figures for stone facade, excavation and concrete may or may not be in the estimate we will review with you wednesday.
I too hope to work things out.

-----Original Message-----

From: "J. Epstein" jeeproject@yahoo.com
Subj: Fw: John Amerling
Date: Sat Dec 30, 2006 11:55 am
Size: 7K
To: "Jack Parker" jparker@reed-reed.com

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
To: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 11:55:53 AM
Subject: Re: John Amerling

please provide rough cash flow requirements monthly as well as a construction schedule that ties into the permit document faxed yesterday.. Also please have art prepared to clarify cost estimates,,i.e.316000 stone facade, 200 cy concrete, and 250k excavation. I hope we can work this out wed

----- Original Message ----
From: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
To: Jack Parker jparker@reed-reed.com
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 4:34:21 PM
Subject: Re: John Amerling

We have been pleading for the structural people to be engaged asap.. mr molynewux is appoplectic, that after producing drawings on rand r's schedule, he has no idea where we are.

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker jparker@reed-reed.com
To: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
Cc: Art Cavanagh acavanagh@reed-reed.com
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 4:05:39 PM
Subject: RE: John Amerling

you win on the 'buyout' stuff.

i take the liberty to summarize the high points of our conversation.

  1.    we have offered to discount our october ($26,340) and november ($17,031) bills by 50%.  you accepted and offered to have them paid right away. 
    
  2.    contract:  we need one asap in order to proceed with managing the work.  (we agree on this) 
    
  3.    contract issues;  
    
  4.    a) i proposed to reduce our fixed profit on the cm contract from $3.0m to $2.8 m.  it would be billed in equal monthly installments over the 36 month term of the project.  at the end of the project, if you are happy, you pay us the additional 200k. i said i would channel this to our people to provide personal incentives for performance.  if you are not happy, you don't pay the 200k. b) for portions of the work that one of our affiliate companies might bid for, those bids will be lump sum, not subject to any limitation on mark-up.  as construction managers, we would seek competing bids from other qualified subcontractors.  we would analyze the bids and scopes of work and present them to you (or your designee) along with our recommendation for award.  you would decide to whom the work should be awarded.  
    
  5.    we will prepare for your review an up-to-date budget of the office building.  it will include the various subcontractors and vendors selected and engaged by the architect that we have been given.  tuesday art is traveling to stt and i am returning from florida to maine.  we propose to deliver the estimate to you wednesday.  art would sit with you in your office and i would be on the phone.  we would review the estimate to your satisfaction.  at the end of that review, we will finalize and execute a contract for construction management.  if you remain unhappy with our work after that review, we will bow out of the project. 
    
  6.    we will try to find out what the coconut wall is.
    

in additon there are 2 things i want to advise you of: 1) it is absoultely critical that you engage on a contract basis the services of the maguire group to complete necessary engineering work. failure to do so will delay the work. 2) art has set up a conference call tomorrow morning to kick start things. see below


-----Original Message-----

From: Jeff McCormick [mailto:JMcCormick@MaguireGroup.com mailto:JMcCormick@MaguireGroup.com ]

Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 12:50 PM

To: Darren Indyke; Douglas Stine; Barry Kimball; Art Cavanagh; John Cooney; John Amerling; Doug Schoettle

Subject: Little St. James teleconference

Gentlemen, RRCI's Art Cavanagh has planned a teleconference call for Friday, December 29, 2006 at 10:30 EST to discuss Little St James construction planning, project design status, permitting status, schedules and responsibilities. An agenda will be forwarded next week. The latest version of construction phasing/masterplan buildout will also be forwarded in pdf format for discussion.


thank you for your time today.

jack


From: J. Epstein [mailto:jeeproject@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 3:21 PM
To: Jack Parker
Subject: Fw: John Amerling

please see last paragraph

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
To: Cecilia Steen cecilia.steen@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:02:07 PM
Subject: Re: John Amerling

I did not receive an e-mail last week

----- Original Message ----
From: Cecilia Steen cecilia.steen@gmail.com
To: JE jeeproject@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:53:55 PM
Subject: John Amerling

Just got a chance to open e mails. The response is Yes subject to the following:

  1. I had a physical problem which cost me some time at work and affected my mobility over the past week so I could not personally meet with DPNR to get a clear picture of permit status and I lost a couple of days on this project; I hope to go to DPNR tomorrow if I can convince my wife to let me drive a car.
  2. The agency has been under a microscope from the staff review teams assigned to evaluate agencies by the incoming Governor; I hope that this distraction does not disturb the pace of the agency reviews.
  3. The design reviews of the indoor pool expansion produced comments and changes which have to be incorporated into the final drawings to be used for building permit purposes.
  4. This process apparently awaits some further approvals of the pool which Mr. Molyneux is discussing with Mr. Epstein.
  5. I personally visited Aercon on another project two weeks ago to investigate the possible use of air entrained concrete panels which would reduce the amount of concrete used in the project; that review was very positive; the Aercon engineers are now in direct communication with Maguire to see of the panels can be used in the indoor pool expansion.
  6. The schedule which I sent Mr. Epstein last week records all of these events.
  7. Some engineering bills are becoming due; I thought it timely for us to prepare a master budget of all activities which I intend to review internally tomorrow for distribution so that Mr. Epstein or his staff can track actual and projected project expenses.
  8. We are assembling construction personnel and starting buy out for the office construction and are very much in need of an overall contract; I will send Darren a fresh draft tomorrow which may help clarify the relationships.

From: Cecilia Steen [mailto: cecilia.steen@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 10:03 AM
To: John Amerling
Subject: From Jeffrey Epstein

Hi John,

Jeffrey's wondering if we are on track?

Cecilia

212 750 9895


Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42297/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com http://mail.yahoo.com/


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

J
J. Epstein Jan 4, 2007 10:41 PM
To
Jack Parker

please send me a memo describing what you believe you delivered vs what you were required under the contract to deliver.. We are doing the same,, but it will save us both aggro.. just be candid

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker jparker@reed-reed.com
To: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2007 4:33:25 PM
Subject: RE: Fw: John Amerling

Thank you for sending this.
I will have John Amerling join us for tomorrow's 10.00est call. He is
in a much better position to answer your questions.
I think of our work for you in two simple phases: one, getting ready to
perform the work and, two, executing the work. John ably managed the
first part and we now have assigned a construction team to the second
phase. It is my hope and expectation that we can move forward soon with
phase two.
I thought the call today was productive and I hope I was not to spirited
in some of my replies.
Talk to you in the morning.
Jack

-----Original Message-----
From: J. Epstein [mailto:jeeproject@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 3:04 PM
To: Jack Parker
Subject: Re: Fw: John Amerling

Jack I just received this this afternoon from Rampino... Please share
this with the three that just left as this subject came up before they
left.. Good afternoon Darren,

I had a few questions to help my prep as we get started.

First - when is the expected startup date approximately.
my
early discussions with J. Amerling had instructed me to procure 2
additional boats into the Virgin islands for a 1/15/07 start date. now I
bellieve this to be a little optimistic but i need some clarification .

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker jparker@reed-reed.com
To: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
Cc: Acavanagh@reed-reed.com
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 12:28:00 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: John Amerling

I have forwarded this to art.
He will be re-estimating the entire job so those figures for stone
facade, excavation and concrete may or may not be in the estimate we
will review with you wednesday.
I too hope to work things out.

-----Original Message-----

From: "J. Epstein" jeeproject@yahoo.com
Subj: Fw: John Amerling
Date: Sat Dec 30, 2006 11:55 am
Size: 7K
To: "Jack Parker" jparker@reed-reed.com

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
To: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 11:55:53 AM
Subject: Re: John Amerling

please provide rough cash flow requirements monthly as well as a
construction schedule that ties into the permit document faxed
yesterday.. Also please have art prepared to clarify cost
estimates,,i.e.316000 stone facade, 200 cy concrete, and 250k
excavation. I hope we can work this out wed

----- Original Message ----
From: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
To: Jack Parker jparker@reed-reed.com
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 4:34:21 PM
Subject: Re: John Amerling

We have been pleading for the structural people to be engaged asap.. mr
molynewux is appoplectic, that after producing drawings on rand r's
schedule, he has no idea where we are.

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker jparker@reed-reed.com
To: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
Cc: Art Cavanagh acavanagh@reed-reed.com
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 4:05:39 PM
Subject: RE: John Amerling

you win on the 'buyout' stuff.

i take the liberty to summarize the high points of our conversation.

  1.    we have offered to discount our october ($26,340) and november
    

($17,031) bills by 50%. you accepted and offered to have them paid
right away.
2. contract: we need one asap in order to proceed with managing
the work. (we agree on this)
3. contract issues;
4. a) i proposed to reduce our fixed profit on the cm contract
from $3.0m to $2.8 m. it would be billed in equal monthly installments
over the 36 month term of the project. at the end of the project, if
you are happy, you pay us the additional 200k. i said i would channel
this to our people to provide personal incentives for performance. if
you are not happy, you don't pay the 200k. b) for portions of the work
that one of our affiliate companies might bid for, those bids will be
lump sum, not subject to any limitation on mark-up. as construction
managers, we would seek competing bids from other qualified
subcontractors. we would analyze the bids and scopes of work and
present them to you (or your designee) along with our recommendation for
award. you would decide to whom the work should be awarded.
5. we will prepare for your review an up-to-date budget of the
office building. it will include the various subcontractors and vendors
selected and engaged by the architect that we have been given. tuesday
art is traveling to stt and i am returning from florida to maine. we
propose to deliver the estimate to you wednesday. art would sit with
you in your office and i would be on the phone. we would review the
estimate to your satisfaction. at the end of that review, we will
finalize and execute a contract for construction management. if you
remain unhappy with our work after that review, we will bow out of the
project.
6. we will try to find out what the coconut wall is.

in additon there are 2 things i want to advise you of: 1) it is
absoultely critical that you engage on a contract basis the services of
the maguire group to complete necessary engineering work. failure to do
so will delay the work. 2) art has set up a conference call tomorrow
morning to kick start things. see below



-----Original Message-----

From: Jeff McCormick [mailto:JMcCormick@MaguireGroup.com
mailto:JMcCormick@MaguireGroup.com ]

Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 12:50 PM

To: Darren Indyke; Douglas Stine; Barry Kimball; Art Cavanagh; John
Cooney; John Amerling; Doug Schoettle

Subject: Little St. James teleconference

Gentlemen, RRCI's Art Cavanagh has planned a teleconference call for
Friday, December 29, 2006 at 10:30 EST to discuss Little St James
construction planning, project design status, permitting status,
schedules and responsibilities. An agenda will be forwarded next week.
The latest version of construction phasing/masterplan buildout will also
be forwarded in pdf format for discussion.



thank you for your time today.

jack


From: J. Epstein [mailto:jeeproject@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 3:21 PM
To: Jack Parker
Subject: Fw: John Amerling

please see last paragraph

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: J. Epstein jeeproject@yahoo.com
To: Cecilia Steen cecilia.steen@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:02:07 PM
Subject: Re: John Amerling

I did not receive an e-mail last week

----- Original Message ----
From: Cecilia Steen cecilia.steen@gmail.com
To: JE jeeproject@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:53:55 PM
Subject: John Amerling

Just got a chance to open e mails. The response is Yes subject to the
following:

  1. I had a physical problem which cost me some time at work and

affected my mobility over the past week so I could not personally meet
with DPNR to get a clear picture of permit status and I lost a couple of
days on this project; I hope to go to DPNR tomorrow if I can convince my
wife to let me drive a car.
2. The agency has been under a microscope from the staff review teams
assigned to evaluate agencies by the incoming Governor; I hope that this
distraction does not disturb the pace of the agency reviews.
3. The design reviews of the indoor pool expansion produced comments
and changes which have to be incorporated into the final drawings to be
used for building permit purposes.
4. This process apparently awaits some further approvals of the pool
which Mr. Molyneux is discussing with Mr. Epstein.
5. I personally visited Aercon on another project two weeks ago to
investigate the possible use of air entrained concrete panels which
would reduce the amount of concrete used in the project; that review was
very positive; the Aercon engineers are now in direct communication with
Maguire to see of the panels can be used in the indoor pool expansion.
6. The schedule which I sent Mr. Epstein last week records all of
these events.
7. Some engineering bills are becoming due; I thought it timely for
us to prepare a master budget of all activities which I intend to review
internally tomorrow for distribution so that Mr. Epstein or his staff
can track actual and projected project expenses.
8. We are assembling construction personnel and starting buy out for
the office construction and are very much in need of an overall
contract; I will send Darren a fresh draft tomorrow which may help
clarify the relationships.


From: Cecilia Steen [mailto: cecilia.steen@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 10:03 AM
To: John Amerling
Subject: From Jeffrey Epstein

Hi John,

Jeffrey's wondering if we are on track?

Cecilia

212 750 9895


Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42297/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/m
ailbeta>


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com http://mail.yahoo.com/


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV