Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right Re: Telephone call
arrow_back

Re: Telephone call

4 messages picture_as_pdf Source PDF
J
J. Epstein Jan 5, 2007 6:14 PM
To
Jack Parker
monday

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker <jparker@reed-reed.com>
To: J. Epstein <jeeproject@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, January 5, 2007 11:44:57 AM
Subject: Telephone call

Telephone call

Jeffrey,

I have a previous commitment that will become a schedule conflict in about 30 minutes.  Should we set a new time for the call, say 2.00 pm your time?

Jack

________________

Jackson A. Parker
President & C.E.O.
Reed & Reed, Inc.
Woolwich, Maine
________________





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
J
J. Epstein Jan 6, 2007 1:33 PM
To
Jack Parker
Cc
John Amerling<DKIESQ@aol.com>
I think the only way to move forward is for your firm to   provide what was  clearly agreed to in the contract of feb 14 2006. Specifically an all in  budget for the office and schedule, ,  A target project budget( broken out by phases and buildings)  and schedules as deliniated in 1 e of the contract., this should include, but not be limited to  barging , and transportiation of workers,Please assume lsj is responsible for absolutely nothing, (i.e. insurance , transport,etc)  site lighting, infrastrucure enhancements, all consultants required , permitting requirements,   Think of it as a general contractor with a fixed bid. ( understand that you will be conservative, but that can be handled with a flex factor of 10- 15%, i.e. best guess of actuals plus a specific amount of contingencies. A rough turnkey price for the office pool building, library complex main house roads, etc. The list of drop dead dates, as the contract specifies, to enable us to measure realistic progress  and anticipate problems, A thorough list of capital equiptment needed, the logistics plan for staging and storage, worker transport  and concrete delivery methods. A list of consultants you think necessary.. please include all general conditions and there cash flow requirements, staff housing transport etc, , also a list of work that you would anticipate self performing.including equiptment provided .( ie.e are we using your cranes and if so at what rate.). the roads, asphalt conduit for lighting telephone and water, ... I would appreciate you giving me a realistic sense of  when I can expect this, and will, after review,  either come to Maine to meet you and your team , or set up a meeting in new york or st, thomas.

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker <jparker@reed-reed.com>
To: J. Epstein <jeeproject@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, January 5, 2007 1:15:56 PM
Subject: RE: Telephone call

Telephone call
what time?


From: J. Epstein [mailto:jeeproject@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 1:15 PM
To: Jack Parker
Subject: Re: Telephone call

monday

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker <jparker@reed-reed.com>
To: J. Epstein <jeeproject@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, January 5, 2007 11:44:57 AM
Subject: Telephone call

Jeffrey,

I have a previous commitment that will become a schedule conflict in about 30 minutes.  Should we set a new time for the call, say 2.00 pm your time?

Jack

________________

Jackson A. Parker
President & C.E.O.
Reed & Reed, Inc.
Woolwich, Maine
________________





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
J
J. Epstein Jan 8, 2007 3:31 AM
To
Jack Parker
Cc
John Amerling
I gave john  a ride to New York with  the intention of reviewing the documents you left.. Frankly I became very disturbed over how many inaccuracies, and omisions, were contained in the report. AS I know you wanted to secure a finalized contract,I am amazed that this was the level of work on which you were relying in order to provide me with the confidence that had been lacking.I had   thought  that after all our discussions that at least this time the numbers and schedule for the offfice would be somewhat within the bounds of accurate.Johm amerlin was unable to reconcile so many items that I asked how this was possible.. I told him in no uncertain terms that my entire staff had lost confidence in the ability of your firm to provide what I had clearly contracted for. A project of my scale  with no capital equiptment numbers at this time, no barging , transportation , or  various consultants missing,.  He had no answers except for the statement that he had decided he was unable to continue to work on the project. , and had decided to leave your firm.I like john , and immediately proposed a relationsip with him..

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker <jparker@reed-reed.com>
To: J. Epstein <jeeproject@yahoo.com>
Cc: DKIESQ@aol.com; Art Cavanagh <acavanagh@reed-reed.com>; John Cooney <jcooney@reed-reed.com>; jamerling@viaccess.net
Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2007 8:46:36 AM
Subject: RE: Telephone call

Telephone call
i will discuss with our team and by monday we will provide you with a schedule for these deliverables. 


From: J. Epstein [mailto:jeeproject@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 8:34 AM
To: Jack Parker
Cc: John Amerling; DKIESQ@aol.com
Subject: Re: Telephone call

I think the only way to move forward is for your firm to   provide what was  clearly agreed to in the contract of feb 14 2006. Specifically an all in  budget for the office and schedule, ,  A target project budget( broken out by phases and buildings)  and schedules as deliniated in 1 e of the contract., this should include, but not be limited to  barging , and transportiation of workers,Please assume lsj is responsible for absolutely nothing, (i.e. insurance , transport,etc)  site lighting, infrastrucure enhancements, all consultants required , permitting requirements,   Think of it as a general contractor with a fixed bid. ( understand that you will be conservative, but that can be handled with a flex factor of 10- 15%, i.e. best guess of actuals plus a specific amount of contingencies. A rough turnkey price for the office pool building, library complex main house roads, etc. The list of drop dead dates, as the contract specifies, to enable us to measure realistic progress  and anticipate problems, A thorough list of capital equiptment needed, the logistics plan for staging and storage, worker transport  and concrete delivery methods. A list of consultants you think necessary.. please include all general conditions and there cash flow requirements, staff housing transport etc, , also a list of work that you would anticipate self performing.including equiptment provided .( ie.e are we using your cranes and if so at what rate.). the roads, asphalt conduit for lighting telephone and water, ... I would appreciate you giving me a realistic sense of  when I can expect this, and will, after review,  either come to Maine to meet you and your team , or set up a meeting in new york or st, thomas.

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker <jparker@reed-reed.com>
To: J. Epstein <jeeproject@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, January 5, 2007 1:15:56 PM
Subject: RE: Telephone call

what time?


From: J. Epstein [mailto:jeeproject@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 1:15 PM
To: Jack Parker
Subject: Re: Telephone call

monday

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker <jparker@reed-reed.com>
To: J. Epstein <jeeproject@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, January 5, 2007 11:44:57 AM
Subject: Telephone call

Jeffrey,

I have a previous commitment that will become a schedule conflict in about 30 minutes.  Should we set a new time for the call, say 2.00 pm your time?

Jack

________________

Jackson A. Parker
President & C.E.O.
Reed & Reed, Inc.
Woolwich, Maine
________________





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
J
J. Epstein Jan 8, 2007 1:33 PM
To
Jack Parker
I agree it is curious.,, HOwver after describing to you my concerns, you provided to me what should have been , if I was in your shoes a document, that you could stand by and be proud of, knowing my concerns for accuracy and completeness, I was very clear that you should take as long as necessary to get it to where I could make an informed decision , as I was willing to give your firm the benefit of the doubt. . I told you I would not harp on the work previously unaccomplished, but would look to your new presentation.. I said take as long as you need , as you want a contract..  I find it remarkable , that you then propose a three year deal with a fee of 2.8 vs, 3 million, and then in the meeting your people tell me that that, is totally unrealsitic. and the time frames are inaccurate.. ,  IF I would have signed what you proposed I would have found myself at the end of our contract, with a substantial amount of work still undone.. LOgistics, which were to have been a vital part, totally, unthought through, and I was met with the repsonses,,, well we will figure that out..
----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker <jparker@reed-reed.com>
To: J. Epstein <jeeproject@yahoo.com>
Cc: jamerling@viaccess.net
Sent: Monday, January 8, 2007 6:15:42 AM
Subject: RE: Telephone call

Telephone call
i am not quite sure what might have transpired between wja and you during your flight to new york.  my team and i have worked this weekend and planned to continue for the next couple of days preparing the information you outlined in your email saturday morning (below).  we had planned to propose a meeting with you in new york on friday to review these budgets, schedules and analyses.
 
i must say that it is a little odd to suddenly learn from you that my friend and general counsel for the past 6 1/2 years is leaving my employment to have a relationship with you.  given the fact that he has been responsible for producing the information called for in our preconstruction services proposal and given your apparent dissatisfaction with that data, i find it this turn of events curious.
 
in view of the present circumstances, it does not seem to make sense to continue with our work.  is this your view as well?
 
 


From: J. Epstein [mailto:jeeproject@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 10:31 PM
To: Jack Parker
Cc: John Amerling
Subject: Re: Telephone call

I gave john  a ride to New York with  the intention of reviewing the documents you left.. Frankly I became very disturbed over how many inaccuracies, and omisions, were contained in the report. AS I know you wanted to secure a finalized contract,I am amazed that this was the level of work on which you were relying in order to provide me with the confidence that had been lacking.I had   thought  that after all our discussions that at least this time the numbers and schedule for the offfice would be somewhat within the bounds of accurate.Johm amerlin was unable to reconcile so many items that I asked how this was possible.. I told him in no uncertain terms that my entire staff had lost confidence in the ability of your firm to provide what I had clearly contracted for. A project of my scale  with no capital equiptment numbers at this time, no barging , transportation , or  various consultants missing,.  He had no answers except for the statement that he had decided he was unable to continue to work on the project. , and had decided to leave your firm.I like john , and immediately proposed a relationsip with him..

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Parker <jparker@reed-reed.com>
To: J. Epstein <jeeproject@yahoo.com>
Cc: DKIESQ@aol.com; Art Cavanagh <acavanagh@reed-reed.com>; John Cooney <jcooney@reed-reed.com>; jamerling@viaccess.net
Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2007 8:46:36 AM
Subject: RE: Telephone call

i will discuss with our team and by monday we will provide you with a schedule for these deliverables. 


From: J. Epstein [mailto:jeeproject@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 8:34 AM
To: Jack Parker
Cc: John Amerling; DKIESQ@aol.com
Subject: Re: Telephone call

I think the only way to move forward is for your firm to   provide what was  clearly agreed to in the contract of feb 14 2006. Specifically an all in  budget for the office and schedule, ,  A target project budget( broken out by phases and buildings)  and schedules as deliniated in 1 e of the contract., this should include, but not be limited to  barging , and transportiation of workers,Please assume lsj is responsible for absolutely nothing, (i.e. insurance , transport,etc)  site lighting, infrastrucure enhancements, all consultants required , permitting requirements,   Think of it as a general contractor with a fixed bid. ( understand that you will be conservative, but that can be handled with a flex factor of 10- 15%, i.e. best guess of actuals plus a specific amount of contingencies. A rough turnkey price for the office pool building, library complex main house roads, etc. The list of drop dead dates, as the contract specifies, to enable us to measure realistic progress  and anticipate problems, A thorough list of capital equiptment needed, the logistics plan for staging and storage, worker transport  and concrete delivery methods. A list of consultants you think necessary.. please include all general conditions and there cash flow requirements, staff housing transport etc, , also a list of work that you would anticipate self performing.including equiptment provided .( ie.e are we using your cranes and if so at what rate.). the roads, asphalt conduit for lighting telephone and water, ... I would appreciate you giving me a realistic sense of  when I can expect this, and will, after review,  either come to Maine to meet you and your team , or set up a meeting in new york or st, thomas.


http://mail.yahoo.com


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV