arrow_back
Sex and the SPS guy
1 message picture_as_pdf Source PDF
S
Stephen M. Kosslyn Oct 1, 2007 2:15 PM
To
J. Epstein
Hi Jeffrey:
I've been thinking more about the virtues of sex with a 40-year-old woman who you know well and have come to love. This is a good thing. Here's why:
Claim 1: Factors that make someone physically
attractive trigger the desire to procreate, and those factors have
this effect throughout life
Justification: For males, it's
possible to continue to father children very late in life, so this
makes sense from the point of view of the species.
Claim 2: But even if sex were just
about procreation for our ancestors, it's not mostly about procreation
for modern humans.
Justification: The vast majority of
sexual acts (well over 95%, according to surveys) have nothing to do
with procreation.
Claim 3: In addition to
its role in procreation, sex has been "exapted" (to use
Gould & Vrba's term) to facilitate intimate relationships. This is
by analogy to the way that the nose evolved initially to direct scents
and warm air but then was able to be pressed into service holding up
reading glasses.
Justification: Children are demonstrably better off
when raised in a stable family structure. To the extent that sex keeps
the family together, this is good for the species. Thus, individuals
who had the capacity to use sex this way may have had more offspring
that survived (and they had more offspring that survived, and so on),
and hence this characteristic was propagated through the species
(either assuming that it is partly genetically determined or simply
that it is transmitted as a meme).
Claim 4: Intimate
relationships do more than create an environment for raising children;
they also promote the personal development of the individuals.
Justification: Intimate relationships are defined in
terms of allowing oneself to be vulnerable to others, to allow them to
learn one's "unmanaged" characteristics and to provide
direct feedback. Why would anyone do this? It's not because the other
person "holds up a mirror" - a mirror simply reflects back
what you already can see. Instead, the other person can get beyond the
surface, can peel back the skin, and lead you to see what was not
previously apparent. Such information allows one to "work on"
characteristics that one deems inappropriate or not optimal - that is,
to "grow."
Claim 5. Older women are better able
to be "intimate partners."
Justification: With age and experience comes
sophistication, allowing them to see you more clearly and to provide
more useful feedback - and hence to be better at helping you to
grow.
Claim 6: Personal growth is important.
Justification: To the extent that one grows, one
knows one's own strengths and weaknesses and becomes better able to
interact with others. This in turn brings one closer to GOD (in the
SPS sense), with all that that implies.
Ergo: Sex is not just about pleasures of the flesh. It's also about pleasures of the mind. And older women are better able to provide such sophisticated and nuanced minded-sex.
I've been thinking more about the virtues of sex with a 40-year-old woman who you know well and have come to love. This is a good thing. Here's why:
Ergo: Sex is not just about pleasures of the flesh. It's also about pleasures of the mind. And older women are better able to provide such sophisticated and nuanced minded-sex.
--
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Stephen M. Kosslyn
830 William James Hall
Harvard University
33 Kirkland Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
voice: 1-617-495-3932
fax: 1-617-496-3122
web: http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~kwn/
Stephen M. Kosslyn
830 William James Hall
Harvard University
33 Kirkland Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
voice: 1-617-495-3932
fax: 1-617-496-3122
web: http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~kwn/
