this is how crazy

1.my team consists of professionals with over 250 years of criminal experience. In an abundance of care , we have also consulted with outside ethics experts,and former justice dept officials .The clear and unanimous consensus is they find the conduct outrageous and frankly not one of them , has been able to recall seeing anything like this before.. .2 . After the state had conducted its own investigation and returned a grand jury indictment.,the federal gov't , while adamantly refusing to coordinate with the duly elected district attorney, and his sex prosecutor of 13 years, ,, engaged in a virtual extortion , to force the defendant and his counsel to go the state ,and in a wholly unprecedented step, demand , himself that he be charged with a crime greater than the state and grand jury thought appropriate. They then further demanded he obtain, from the state a sentence much greater than the state and its officials wanted., including
having to register as a sex offender, a position that the state adamantly opposed. They then compounded their outrageous behavior by then demanding that Epstein pay an unnamed list of people "alleged victims",, a minimum of 150 thousand dollars each. No matter what their actual damages. They then refused the defendant, even the right to contact these adults.or conduct his own investigation. This was demanded in exchange for the gov't not prosecuting him for crimes, that they , the feds admittedly could only make the most tenuous connection to. The ausa then suggested the defendant be required to hire one of her friends as a
continency lawyer, to , be paid for by the defendant to actually sue the defendant himself ,on behalf of a list of adults that she would only make avaliable after sentencing.. They threatened to use the sex tourism statute 2423 ( with a min mandatory sentence of 10 years) , and apply it to a man going to his home in Florida, a state where he has had a home for twenty years. They also threatened , to bring a case based on the Internet luring statute,2422 that would have to be tortured and stretched beyond all recognition to apply.( in fact there was no internet use at all). They demanded a jail sentence for someone , who had no criminal history,, no violence , drugs, no position of authority, then when they were confronted with an extensive brief as to why these statutes did not apply, they threatened to bring a money crime based on a illegal money transmitting business, even though no such business ever actually existed.. After subpoenaing his
tax returns , and medical records, they then suggested a money laundering charge or a host of others including the mann act, obstruction etc. , even though they were unable to even postulate the minimum prerequisitie of a specified unlawful activity,.

  ____________________________________________________________________________________

Be a better pen pal.
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how. http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/