(no subject)

I am writing this as a follow-up to my meeting with
both you and Lanna, in an attempt to resolve the
Epstein matter. At that meeting , after eight months
of investigation, , you and I learned for the very
first time , and I believe to our collective
disbelief, that the allegation of the girl in
question,( a girls' whose credibility we agreed is at
best marginal) did not raise the slightest hint of
either actual, or even requested oral or vaginal sex.
In fact the statement read to us by Lanna,
remarkably claimed the "victim" climbed on TOP of my
client to give him a massage(presumably while he was
face down). She also stated she was not even fully
undressed., but unconvincingly alleges he "whacked
off". You have previously been provided copies of her
original web page where she herself has chosen ,at
least in this instance ,confirmed in writing, to
first represent her age as 17, (accompanied by a
nude photograph), then ,is in her own words " kicked
off" the server for the suggestive nature of her
photo. She then changes the age to 16, along with
additional bragging about shoplifting "alot", underage
drinking , smoking,( assuredly requiring her to
repeatedly
lie about her age) and sex. She then, only four
days before the last scheduled grand jury, and ten
days after being described by a police officer as
being
clearly on drugs, unable to stand ,with bloodshot and
dilated eyes(the police report filed on MArch 31,
2006, copy provided), changes her age once again , but
now to 15. As if this were not enough, her last
rendition of her web page, only two weeks old, is now
entitled " FUCK YA 2, " emblazoned with a new photo ,
but this time , the pose is " on top " of her new male
friend. This is now also accompanied by an additional
police report, but this time from Georgia, stating she
had run away and been eventually found in a highly
direputable drug complex.(report also provided) The
issue of her credibility is certainly not strengthened
, by her own father's statement that she has been
using drugs since the age of 14 ,and was previously
admitted into a rehab facility. You would be right to
question the father's veracity however, as we have
also provided to you the documentation detailing his
previous felony conviction and evidence of his serving

prison time for bank fraud. I think it would be
helpful to describe the facts of this case as
agreed...
This girl, was driven to my clients' home (by a
stripper, who told her to be certain to represent
herself as 18) , with the express and sole purpose to
provide him a topless massage. She apparently lied and
told him she was
18( my clients true understanding confirmed by the
results of a lie detector test, administered by George
Slattery). When she left, she received her agreed upon
two hundred dollars, wrote her phone number down and
stated that the next time she would like to bring her
twin sister.
We are led to believe that several MONTHS
later, one of her parents,(her mother also a
fraudster,
completing her own P.T.I. ,in March of this year) ,
contacted the police. Barry,, seperate and apart from
the pressure being apparently brought to bear by law
enforcement(
somewhat overly invested in the outcome,it seems,as
opposed to the facts) your office in keeping with your
commitment to Alan Dershowitz, regarding not bringing
a "touching case"( illustrated by your story of the
fifteen year old stripper)especially where there are
no aggravating circumstances ,and there are clearly
none in this case . I believe now, should
affirmatively decide NOT
to charge .. This would also be in keeping with the
agreed upon statement that if my client didn't get a"
blow job or get laid" you wouldn't charge . I do
recognize that even though Lanna had stated at our
earlier meeting, that day, that she could" live with a
couple of misdemeanors", I firmly believe that in our
current environment, and given all the provable
facts of this case , and where a Google search is now
a
"forever" reference on job applications, the girls
involved , my client , and all concerned would be
better served with an informal resolution of this case
as opposed to a filing of a charge that we all agree
would likely not succeed if it were to be brought to
trial.I don't think it relevant or fair to include law
enforcement's misplaced desire to simply embarass my
client, by inapproprately subjecting him to a public
trial. I appreciate the personal attention you have
given to this matter, and look forward to you
response.

Do

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com