Re:

not so good

--
please note
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI.

In the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in which Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance from FBI. However Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data before starting time of election, monthly data and entire data which we have gathered for months. Based on this we predicted on our Facebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US.

Our model works but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how much historic data must be analyzed to make the right decision. This could have been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I believe its a great tool to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French elections next year or elections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is expensive and the start up is running out of money.

I am going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea.

Regards,
Zubair Khan