Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right Fwd: This morning
arrow_back

Fwd: This morning

7 messages picture_as_pdf Source PDF
L
LHS Sep 11, 2018 4:16 PM
To
Maskin, Eric
Cc
lhsoffice

It was fun and interesting.

I admire your friends determination.

Are you serious about working on this?

Has anyone done a full analysis of this and polarization.

Seems like on one hand it might encourage Ralph Nader cuz he d get more first round votes and not elect George bush. This might be bad.

On other hand, gore would not have to move left to take Nader vote.

If I like centrism is it clear that this is better.

I get that it avoids arbitrary outcomes but assume that a tea party nut is as likely to elect a dem as a lefty is to elect et a republican.

Anyway thanks for setting up.

Btw I gave them 10,000.

Larry
Sent from my iPad

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: █████████████████████████

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

M
Maskin, Eric Sep 11, 2018 6:05 PM

Hi Larry,

Thank you very much for taking the meeting this morning. I'm glad you found it worthwhile, and I agree with you that Adam Friedman's commitment to the project is impressive.

I AM serious about working on this---it's a nice opportunity to make important practical use of some interesting theory. Voting rules may seem nerdy and dry, but they can make an enormous difference to actual politics

The formal argument that RCV promotes centrism better than the current system (plurality rule) is straightforward. Suppose that most voters vote ideologically in the sense that the closer a candidate is to their own position on the left-right spectrum, the more like they are to vote for him. Then under majority rule (my favorite voting system)---in which voters rank candidates and the winner is the candidate who beats all other in pairwise comparisons----the winner will be the median voter's favorite candidate -----in other words, the most centrist candidate gets elected (this assumes that there are enough candidates running so that there is one who is reasonably close to the median voter). Now observe that RCV is in between majority rule and plurality rule, and so will promote centrism better than plurality rule.

Best wishes, Eric

L
LHS Sep 11, 2018 7:52 PM
To
Maskin, Eric
Cc
lhsoffice

I get that formal argument

What about aspects not quite in model.
More folk will run from extremes if they can attract more First run votes. Candidates can position a bit.

Separately I pitched this to someone today.

He said he had heard that because of its greater complexity African American and lower income turnout was depressed.
Is there evidence on turnout impacts?

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: █████████████████

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

M
Maskin, Eric Sep 11, 2018 10:20 PM

Yes, we can expect more extremists to run under RCV. But also more centrists (e.g., Bloomberg). Since the centrists are closer to the median voter, they will defeat the extremists.

The evidence I have seen suggests that RCV increases turn-out. [But it's important that voters be given the choice to rank as many or few candidates as they like, so that a voter always has the option of voting for a single candidate (in effect, he would be ranking all other candidates as tied for second). In practice, most voters choose to rank two or three candidates, but a significant fraction just rank one]

In fact the increase in the diversity of candidates under RCV is related to turn-out. If RCV had been used in 2016, Bernie Sanders could have run as an independent in the general election without fear of guaranteeing a Trump victory. Many of the Bernie supporters who stayed home on election day might then have voted---and presumably would have ranked Clinton second. This would have given her a victory over Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania (and possibly elsewhere).

Eric

L
LHS Sep 11, 2018 10:23 PM
To
Maskin, Eric
Cc
lhsoffice

Are there empirical studies on turnout.

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: █████████████████

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

M
Maskin, Eric Sep 11, 2018 10:24 PM
To
LHS

I believe there are, but don't know how careful they are. I will try to get you references.

L
Larry Summers Sep 12, 2018 3:01 AM
To
jeevacation@gmail.com

Importance: High

More than u may want to know

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: █████████████████

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

Begin forwarded message:

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV