Vanity Fair

Klein's questions follow, below. If we are to respond, I would advise we stick to written responses rather than engage via 'phone. Klein has form for story-twisting re Hillary Clinton. Written responses at least give us an audit trail of what was said.
A lot of this is Mail on Sunday rehash. Klein has our statement, but is offering the chance for further clarification...I get the feeling he's likely to make unflattering assumptions if we don't give him on the record answers.
Please advise on those questions which you feel you more comfortable answering. We can head him off at the pass on those and put legal frighteners on him elsewhere.
Just a caveat - we should be aware that there is a chance that anything other than fully robust answers might be construed as inadvertent admissions of wrongdoing, so we will need legal team to advise on precise wording. Do you want me to pass this on to Devonshires if you have not already done so...?

I would say a paid for story thar was nothing mote than a malicious fabrication -DO YOU MEAN INSTEAD OF ALL OF THIS JUST SAY THAT IT WAS A FABRICATION..WHAT ABOUT SAYING THAT I MET HER WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND LIVING WITH HER FIANCE AND AVOID ALL THE OTHER STUFF
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone

MY PROPOSED ANS IN CAPS..PLSE COMMENT

MY PROPOSED ANS IN CAPS..PLSE COMMENT