Re: for your reading pleasure.. though maybe not
http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/donald-trumps-war-on-
science?intcid=mod-latest
noam is going to tucson on the 7th . will you be =round
i liked the argument that more cot is good for plants?
is the south pole getting =older and more ice ? is it accurate to say that climate =hanges can only be measured over long periods. 20 years or =ore. I m here with the trump peopl in palm and when =sked i say i dont have any idea if this global warming is a =hreat that can be reduced , currently , carbon taking =achines. i guess if that is really a =oncern. i would also like to know what groups =refer warming. canada?
I was in antarctica. The west antarctic ice sheet is =elting at an unprecedented rate.. if it all goes into the ocean, sea =evels will rise by about a meter. You are correct that we should =sk if it can be reduced.. We are currently involved in a proposal =hat explores capturing CO2 from the atmosphere.. That may cost =bout 100/ton CO2.. if there was a carbon tax, that might be doable. =nbsp;it is not clear yet, but total research on this so far <10 =illion. Total research each year on oil and gas exploration >2 =illion.
Lawrence M. Krauss Director, The =rigins Project at ASU Co-Director, =osmology Initiative Foundation=Professor School of Earth =amp; Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ =5287-1404
=/span>