Re:

happy chan=kah. . - has anyone in the past made a=linguistic model that used fields instead of definitions. Q=A0 similar to a magnet field. to some degree. 4o=A0 there is no one vector that describes the word but a field of the=. home surrounded by a field of definitions. not b=sed on 3 d space but based on context . one could =ntegrate over the field. see smoothness. strength , chan=e. . not sure it is useful. but having fun

For word meani=gs, the closest I can think of to something like this is an array of meani=g postulates, in Carnap's sense, something that Jerry Fodor for one ha= toyed with. Multidimensional, but not a field. I don't se= how to work it out, or to extend it to the interpretations of longer unit=.

one of donalds closet people said that remember = he has written three books. . which m=kes him one of the few people in the world that has written more books tha= he has read

I read what his ghost-writer=said about him. Pretty scary.

Reminds me of something I=was told by Jon Snow, one of England's most sensible newsmen. He=was with the press entourage accompanying Tony Blair on his visit to Saudi=Arabia, and walking around one of the palaces one day, he saw Blair sittin= in a room with a book in his lap, which greatly surprised him -- until he=came over to talk. It was the New Testament.

And then B=air started telling about how delighted he and Cheri were with the gold do=r handles,....

I notice that your prediction was right =bout Trump's avoiding the White House as far too primitive. Must=be driving the Secret Service up the wall.

I'll keep in mind wh=t you say about Trump's tweets, but they are hard to ignore. Whatever he may think, others here and abroad can't he=p considering the meaning of the words, and take action accordingly.

<=div>About meaning, It's not clear to me how to distinguish the meaning=of "New York" (however it is correctly specified) from the conce=t. Still don't see how to work out field models.

No=m