Fwd:

joe is 70 yearss old wirth 50 - 60m , is suggeting he =ants to negoiatie a bill with his tax lawyer for a years work of his=work that totaled 250k. he will dfenintly need the=lawyer in the future I asked why he spent two minutes thinking about=amounts like these. given his level of trust that he has int he person. =AO and the need for him tin the future. he got it and paid im=editgialy 1

2 as a friend it is not right t= continue to ask for servives after being told the required fee , wi=h the self goal of getting the service and then only aftrwards=negotiating down the price at the end. , not right

3 the elegant solution is to pay the 25m , out of the 3= in cash you received for the art. \

=C2 4. not sure how you can expect me to ever do =nything for you in the future , without payment up front. . 5 surreptiosl paternity

6 audit,=C2 could effect. would have beeen nice to know

7 the 170 will be . what amount do you put on it. ?

reimiburse ??