Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right from the email jan of 2016
arrow_back

from the email jan of 2016

1 message picture_as_pdf Source PDF
J
jeffrey E. Feb 16, 2017 12:18 AM
To
Jeffrey Epstein

transaction complete.!!

in June and the= again Sept, we both agreed to a 50% of phaidon payout., then only after weeks, when you delayed any detailed=20 discussion of money wanting to give the issue a thoughtful resp=nse ( which I fully understand ) . you unilaterally changed changed our agreement. . 5m would be reserved for the future ? . and out of=the remaining 15m ,? i would receive only a third. ( note : I'm=confident that both the debt , and the investment will also lead to a write off of another 30 m. plus=C2 ) In my dining room ,you were surprised when I said that i require most=20 people to pay their advisory fee up front so that I am assured =hat I will be properly compensated for my work when strategies are implemented . you may recall that you appeared offended a=d said " are you suggesting that i would go back on my word " I said no = of course not ! you are my closest of friends ,but my experience is that=C2 when amounts get large, people tend to get unhappy when it actually comes time for them to pay

I included in this letter the email i sent to you on April 15, t=e day i was examining your returns It laid out my understanding of the compensation for a=20 transaction of the magnitude to the penny of the one just completed. =20 though the number was great it was clear. When it appeared that the=20 details could now be worked out I was the first to say , it is too mu=h money, however.

From day zero I proposed to di=count to 50 - 60 million the fair price of the transacti=n just completed . including Phaidon. . though this amount was already substantially les= than our agreed and negotiated formula. - I was never told that this =A0 was out of range. in fact, alternative methods of payment . plane, =r an -in-kind payment were discussed ( ie including keeping the 30m portion of fee outstanding till Marc= ) ,I provided as you specifically requested a detailed step b= step execution plan and reviewed all documents that i was given access to.=( Phaidon was not f=rthcoming ) in order to make my many corrections . =AO I was then told that Alans involvement warranted a discount . Even in the best of l=ght , though it is beyond question that not one time in the three ye=rs of his retainer has he ever proposed a unique idea. (includin= any wayt t= deal with the use issue on debras death ,or even the most basic review of your largest asse= by far , the BRH<=span> agreement. ) O.K. - lets say he made a contribution to the pla= and stretch reality beyond the pale and say it was 50 %. though no =ne could posit such a large amount unless they were wearing a brightly=20 colored clown suit. , the payment associated with the deal was =nown . It had both sent in writing and spoken about on the phone nume=ous times , a detailed execution plan was provided . then an= only then after all was laid out for the group I was told that after a number o= conversations with brad that a total of only 20m would be paid , (and even that was more tha= originally contemplated ) for both transactions . Leon I feel 1= was remarkably unfair. I wondered whether brad even knew of o=r prior agreement.? I called him and he said he was never told.?, I wou=d ask that you I and Brad karp sit together if you think it would be helpful. . I would like to sen= him this email, with your consent of course. If the transactio=s were never consummated , i would not be owed a dime, however , the expect=d fee was known up front. , the detailed step by step plan was f=llowed and overseen by me, the amount that I had requested befo=e the transaction was even begun, and had already been heavily discou=ted, out of friendship, from our agreement . I believe the decision re onl= paying 20 m has frankly , left me felling quite une=sy.

as I said fool me once,=C2 shame on you, by taking something from your close friend and only th=n after using it to its fullest. you decide to pay=what you want . I never would have participated in the transac=ion in any form had i

1

EFTA_R1_01907900
EFTA02660332

known how little you would pay. =AO never, so not to have the shame on me . - = I made it clear that without an upfront agreement I world not work,again once is enoughj , however , I did eventual=y set aside my hard principle . so as not to have my point made in bold =AO by you getting yourself in trouble . a three =our excercise turned into 5 months and many hours. I saved you from=disaster , almost guaranteed - you say , but you said =ou would do "IT " for free . if you don= see, it. i understand, you say the formula was never =n play ,however since the beginning . it was discussed., emailed and calculated , you said you didnt wa=t to pay the 40m per year, so that when you saw value you would pay,=by formula , when did that agreement disappear in your mind./ =AO only AFTER you received the value, had you sai= Jeffrey i have no intention of paying you for the transaction what =ou think is fair, i could have said no. and would have,=C2 : for the 8865 ,I also would have , clearly=not a problem of my making, . only fair. you think the number=is large. you have 3 Billion dollars out of your estate that =ou didnt have when i started. if you will have a problem you =ill see what large numbers look like. . --07 returns bo=ks , you now say are aftercare. ??? eileen tom in 07 aftr care= ? same concept , had you said i expect , your=favorite word ) aftercare I would have said NO . =hen lets not do this , I have always maintained that i a= responsible for my work, and have never retreated from that.=C2 The idea that I should do your tax returns , gift tax returns. =audit. etc. as an after care .. . i will leave to=you to characterize.

=A0

please note

The inform=tion contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-crient privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended onl= for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthor=zed use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereo= is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this<=r>communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail=or by e-mail to mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com , and destroy this communication and all copier thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved =idly>

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV