Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right Re:
arrow_back

Re:

13 messages picture_as_pdf Source PDF
J
jeffrey E. Mar 5, 2017 8:34 AM

I suggest the expression really should be "I think, therefore I believe I am"

J
Joscha Bach Mar 5, 2017 11:29 AM

I believe that I think, but am "I" the agent of thinking?

J
jeffrey E. Mar 5, 2017 11:52 AM

i is a mental construct that gives an evolutionary advantage.

J
Joscha Bach Mar 5, 2017 12:11 PM

absolutely. so are truth and meaning

J
jeffrey E. Mar 5, 2017 12:12 PM

i wonder in game theory what advantage it gives.

J
jeffrey E. Mar 5, 2017 4:48 PM

Law of large numbers is all that is needed

J
Joscha Bach Mar 5, 2017 5:46 PM

I am not sure how to relate that to game theory; you may be able to get that without evolutionary competition. However, game theory is probably the way to explain how we evolve submission to norms beyond indirect reciprocity.

J
Joscha Bach Mar 5, 2017 8:03 PM

Most animals don have a self model, probably because they don't have complex enough brains or long enough training phases (childhoods) to do meta-regulation.

J
jeffrey E. Mar 6, 2017 7:08 AM

they may have physical prothesitcs 40=A0 like cat whiskers. to enable it to guage widith

of hole. ? = A0

J
jeffrey E. Mar 6, 2017 10:50 AM

no, i disagree = the spaceship is only an advanced prosthetic.. not =nteresting at all.. interesting is we have no idea what the top do=n for humans is.. collective . group behavior, I dont=see any differnce between humans and cells , just a diff=rent layer of the same.. regulatory systems. action s =eedbacks and " learning ",. all with no goal . =A0the goals are illusions.. that the indiv thinks they decide. lik= the soldier ant that is recapitualted to a garbage ant if the garbage ant= are wiped out. the soldier ant thinks it made the decision. =C2 .

J
Joscha Bach Mar 6, 2017 11:25 AM

Exactly! Sensors like that are often one of these=solution that get you 80% of the way with 20% of the effort. Except that m=nds that take 15 years to train are o dramatically more expensive that alm=st no species can afford them (but they end up getting you to the moon, wh=ch no prosthesis can).

J
Joscha Bach Mar 6, 2017 3:44 PM

So you don't think that practical intelligence is th= ability to build arbitrary prosthetics?

I agree =hat humans share an important similarity with cells, i.e. they have mechan=sms that suppress individual competition when it conflicts too much with g=oup selection. Without such mechanisms, group selection fails, because wit=in each group, defectors have a local advantage.

=he simplest mechanism to enforce cooperation is reputation, but it works o=ly when others are looking, and manage to keep tallies. To do better than =hat, evolution has to breed a virtual next level regulator into the indivi=ual, which may be your missing "top down for humans". A syste= of norms and taboos, for instance a religion or ideology that people pick=up from their environment.

Individuals can decide= but in social contexts, the utility of decisions is given by how well we =nderstand the constraints under which we operate.

J
jeffrey E. Mar 6, 2017 8:24 PM
To
Joscha Bach

i see it as a complex system agents are buildi=g many things. dependent on the local condition. some take off=as useful in other parts of the system, monkeys using to=ls? I think the term intelligence is too vague. . a crab using=a lure to catch its prey. is a bio inspired prosthetic. =C24o it arguaabley evolved. but cant be sur=.

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV