Re: Fwd:

kathy thought the piece is being la=ded as great investigative journalism so does your=suggested pr group have the better contacts to place a story. on why it is=not. . howeer to you point. to what en=?

This thing as model journalism is one more element that could give=it legs•-so another danger. I don't think it's a question now of d=rectly debunking this. That's going against virtue itself. What l'= like to do is game out everything, creating a structure for thinking this=through. Definitely not a piecemeal response. Figure out where we want to =e and where we can reasonably get and work backwards. Maybe we do agree to=a big interview with you-•Landon Thomas or something like that. But this h=s to be war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be gre=t to get SB input, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hilt=ig or somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you =ecide to do nothing, at least you've come up with a structured way to =hink about it.

He's right. =eeds an overall strategy designed around the question of what you want to =ccomplish. We have to answer the question first.

does . sex for money. prostitution= state crimes. . in new york 2005. 4>=A0 class