Re:

kathy thought the piece is being lauded as great investigat=ve journalism so does your suggested pr group have the b=tter contacts to place a story. on why it is not. .40=A0 howeer to you point. to what end?

This thing as model journalism is one more element that could give it le=s--so another danger. I don't think it's a question now of directl= debunking this. That's going against virtue itself. What I'd like=to do is game out everything, creating a structure for thinking this throu=h. Definitely not a piecemeal response. Figure out where we want to be and=where we can reasonably get and work backwards. Maybe we do agree to a big=interview with you--Landon Thomas or something like that. But this has to =e war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to =et SB input, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hiltzig or=somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you decide=to do nothing, at least you've come up with a structured way to think =bout it.

No content available.

don't tweet this

do you thi=k we highlight , that at the end of the day it was prositution=. sex for money. . a state crime. with=state laws.

At this point I don't think you can go legal=stic. They've won the high ground—young, vulnerable, poor =irls.