Re: Jed Rubenfeld

thx

Good morning!

Jed teaches crim law at Yale. Outspokenly strong on the need for procedural fairness in campus adjudicatory proceedings. Relevant to your friend's unhappy situation? If so, happy to make the connection.

Hugs, Ken

Can you talk? Impt.

I think scholarly but not too much so. no one above =he law. . we began leaving a kingdom. . unlikely t= give king like powers to a president. on one above the law.=C2* I would like lunch pail joe to come away and think ,4)=A0 this guy is smart . I understood . lets see what he writes about the clintons.

someone suggested that trump could shoot someone on fifth avenu= and not lose a vote. that is true , but would make little sen=e for him not to suffer an immediate consequence. the al=owed civil depo setting precedent for criminal process, is a lawyers outline I might think of dumbing it down , again , and sugge=ting that you can sue your neighbor , even if you neighbor is the presiden=. makes little sense that the you can be indicted for as=aulting him but he cannot if he assaults you. Q=A0 low bar for civil higher bar for criminal. . =at some point on your book tour I might point out how disappointed you wer= that the clinton and betty curries' trashcan story , was reopen=d . .

i vote yes as it makes you relevant to today rather =han merely re- reciting an old tale. :) or
tail?

Wise counsel. Thx!

Sent from my iPhone

i read turley,s piece on same subject / federa=ist papers etc. too much in the weeds. avera=e joe. not sure what he concluded