Re: sorry.. this is draft you should look at

Sorry.. here is penultimate version for tonight. I added some paragraphs at the beginning and end that I hope will appeal to the character of Michael Crow, who after all, will be the one reading this and a few other minor changes.

you MUST MUST state the facts accurately. you cannot say the first time was the tabloid article the complaint re australia was first. try not to parse and be clever with details. I would also couch your comment as I believe or it appears. stating as fact that the dean's recommendations is grossly inappropriate. shows the same disregard that they are accusing you of. you attack the judgment of the dean his staff and your accusers. not a winning strategy. you have lost the first round. attacking people is not an appeal. go to the law. its requirements that were not met. admit to a degree of social ineptitude. (for discrimination suit later). talking to others about what great work you do, is also a losing argument. they believe you do sexual things as a matter of course. banter is not harassment. no one complained, the silliness of suggesting a comment about a girl's inappropriate outfit rises to the level of a cause for termination of a tenured professor, needs to be looked at by others.