Re: Draft appeal
Lawrence,
Here you go. As you will see, we have done our level best to make the best arguments on you behalf while keeping it as tight as we possibly can. Please remember, as you read this, that the only things Crow will likely ever read before he makes his decision are Kenney's letter and this. So if we cram too much in there, we will lose him. You will, I am confident, wonder "But why didn't they say this????" at least half a dozen times as you read this. And I get that; it's normal. People hate leaving things left unsaid. But if you say everything, people's eyes glaze over—especially at this stage, when the person doing the reviewing isn't some dean who has plenty of time to pore over something, but the president of the whole school.
I know I'd asked you to send us various email earlier tonight. You'll see in there that we have marked (usually with "XXX") where we need to insert other emails or documents. Please compile those and send them to us as soon as you have a chance. To the extent that you and Nancy want to play paralegal, as we'd discussed before, you could put them all, in order, in a single PDF, which would save us a lot of time (and thus save you money). But obviously, that's totally your call.
Thanks, and we look forward to hearing what you think.
Justin
Justin Dillon
KaiserDillon PLLC
1401 K Street NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20005
please note
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
first paragraph, it must be clear that no one reported misconduct BEFORE the investigation began
sorry, I do not. AT ALL. . . This cant be justins writing. ! it doesnt deal with the main issue. They have the right to fire you if your behavior makes it impossible for you to teach. . if you were to be convicted of beating nancy . etc. you admit much too much, you tell them what they can and cant do you attack your accusers. in todays environment. without giving them respect. . your evidence re not poking the woman in the chest is great. lucy story , you have witness after witness , case already an issue. . saying you wouldnt be that stupid re australia is not a basis for appeal. I didnt intentinally do it. and there is no eveidence that i had intent. period. . dumb criminal. "ridiculous argument. - . they are not saying jumper romper is the issue it was the student made to feel uncomforatble. they are saying there are so many issues over so many years you cannot be allowed to teach there anymore. . you cant offer a compromise in writing . it is weak , that will be part of the conciallaiton discussion. . no one ever complained strong. . no one ever toldyou your admin of the program was anyting but great strong. . attacking these women extra weak.
you can read it even before I do.
just got it.
I will be editing of course.
LMK
Lawrence M. Krauss
Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
Arizona State University,
thx.. there are lots of other errors, but so far I think it hits the right note in general, if specifics are a bit off.. Since it will probably cost me $10K, I hope you agree..
Lawrence M. Krauss
Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
Arizona State University,
Thanks.. I will look at this as I go over the document.
You are wrong about grounds for dismissal of tenure, btw.. but anyway will look at this.
Lawrence M. Krauss
Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics department Arizona State University.