(no subject)

Dear Mr. Davis:

First, your response to Peggy Siegal that you left a number of messages for me tha= have not been returned is simply false. I carefully reviewe= my detailed databases and found absolutely not even one message.

More importantly, Peggy, a single woman in her mid sixties with no support= and who relied upon you to take care of her, asked you to review her business because she belie=ed that she was being taken advantage of. You, Peggy and I agreed more than=six months ago that you would undertake, immediately not a full audit, but a=full random sampling of both past and recent billings to determine how much money Peggy=was owed. Afterwards , a revamp of her current tenuous circumstance driven by y=ur suggestion was to take place . Yesterday, during our conversation, which I have memorialized, you made it very clear that you ha=e done nothing that you said you would.

I know you took offense at the manner in which questions were asked of you. h=wever your comments re the tone of the conversation merely evaded the need=to answer legitmate inquiry. However, despite the many mo=ths you have had to complete your promised review, even today, you still had absolutely no idea about how much money is owed to Peggy, currently or for the past.=AO and had no answers for Peggy except for the same one regarding Corporate Tax that you gave during that initial conversation in May or June. ( a item that you said that Katia explai=ed to you ) Most astonishingly, I learned only today that you asked Peggy to invade her life savings in ord=r to pay her taxes, and that, as a result of your unconscionable neglect, Peg=y had no choice but to do so.

More than six months have passed without you doing anything to fulfill your prom=ses to Peggy to ascertain the extent of the problem and oversee the operation o= her current accounts. I expect you will immediately follow up to discharge your long overdue obligations and rectify this serious breach of your duties to a good woman who trusted you.