(no subject)

trump ok, lets concentrate on you. =trade war maybe good. shakes things up

Jeffrey

final=y landed

very unpleasant journey

you had nothing to do with how Chapman acted and i apologise for suggest=ng it might be otherwise

it was entirely against =e, partly motivated by a spiteful ex-friend

consu=ted two lawyers that Gordon recommended but they were very discouraging

the basic problem is simple—i am goin= against a strong national trend—well-known man after well-known m=n is being brought low for alleged his misbehaviour toward women—i= some case well-deserved prison time (Cosby and perhaps Weinstein) in many=other cases, simply being run out of institutions—exactly my fate<=div>

furthermore in he say/she say confrontation= the evidence has shifted—in University settings at least—=rom 'beyond a reasonable doubt' to a 'preponderance of evidenc=' to 'more positive than negative'

the loss is huge, on the order of a half million to a million dollars,=meant to keep me alive (they were going to offer a five-year contract) whine i let my 'inheritance' be spent on children and grandchildren wh=le also growing

i have no choice but to wo=k

i will get my revised Wild Life to an agent later this week=E2nhave added 5 new chapters and a few sections—much stronger=for the inclusion of my major scientific work-1. social theory bas=d on natural selection and 2. selfish genetic elements selected wi=hin organisms

bob<=span>