Truth Tide TV UNSEALED Epstein Case Files
menu
home Home analytics Reports article Articles auto_stories Narratives mail Email description Documents videocam Videos search Search
policy Investigate expand_more
inbox Inbox 74547 send Sent 28705 label All Mail 74547 attach_file Attachments 1907 topic Topics
People
Jeffrey Epstein person
Ghislaine Maxwell person
Bill Clinton person
Alan Dershowitz person
Elon Musk person
Bill Gates person
Ehud Barak person
Reid Hoffman person
Peter Thiel person
Larry Summers person
Prince Andrew person
Steve Bannon person
Masha Bucher person
Jason Calcanis
Michael Wolff person
Noam Chomsky person
Tom Pritzker person
Al Seckel person
Kimbal Musk person
Karyna Shuliak person
Deepak Chopra person
Ken Starr person
Peter Attia person
Jeremy Rubin person
Neri Oxman person
Marvin Minsky person
Lawrence Krauss person
Seth Lloyd person
Boris Nikolic person
Jean Luc Brunel person
Lesley Groff person
Sarah Kellen person
Nadia Marcinkova person
Darren Indyke person
Mark Epstein person
Emad Hanna person
Joscha Bach person
Rich Kahn person
Cecelia Steen
John Amerling person
Sultan Bin Sulayem person
Matthew Hitzik
Peter Mandelson person
groups People directory
74547 threads 209740 messages
Homechevron_right Emailchevron_right Thanks to the CIA: How became known as a conspiracy theorist (even without a theory)
arrow_back

Thanks to the CIA: How became known as a conspiracy theorist (even without a theory)

1 message picture_as_pdf Source PDF
E
Ed Apr 4, 2012 1:47 PM
To
Epstein, Jeff

Hi Jeff

The CIA recently released this April 1967 Document #1035-960, marked =PSYCH" for Psychological Warfare Operations, in the division "CS", =he Clandestine Services, providing instructions for its "media =ssets". Paragraph #3, (b) explains why it labelled me a "conspiract =heorist," even though my book Inquest: The Warren Commission and the =stablishment of Truth contains no theory other than that the Warren =ommission conducted a flawed investigation. See document excerpt below

RE: Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report 1. Our Concern. From the day of President Kennedy's assassination on, =here has been speculation about the responsibility for his murder. =lthough this was stemmed for a time by the Warren Commission report, =which appeared at the end of September 1964), various writers have now =ad time to scan the Commission's published report and documents for =ew pretexts for questioning, and there has been a new wave of books =nd articles criticizing the Commission's findings. In most cases the =ritics have speculated as to the existence of some kind of conspiracy, =nd often they have implied that the Commission itself was involved. =resumably as a result of the increasing challenge to the Warren =ommission's report, a public opinion poll recently indicated that 46% =f the American public did not think that Oswald acted alone, while =ore than half of those polled thought that the Commission had left =ome questions unresolved. Doubtless polls abroad would show similar, =r possibly more adverse results.

  1. This trend of opinion is a matter of concern to the U.S. government, =ncluding our organization. The members of the Warren Commission were =aturally chosen for their integrity, experience and prominence. They =epresented both major parties, and they and their staff were =eliberately drawn from all sections of the country. Just because of =he standing of the Commissioners, efforts to impugn their rectitude =nd wisdom tend to cast doubt on the whole leadership of American =ociety. Moreover, there seems to be an increasing tendency to hint =hat President Johnson himself, as the one person who might be said to =ave benefited, was in some way responsible for the assassination. =nnuendo of such seriousness affects not only the individual concerned, =ut also the whole reputation of the American government. Our =rganization itself is directly involved: among other facts, we =ontributed information to the investigation. Conspiracy theories have =requently thrown suspicion on our organization, for example by falsely =lleging that Lee Harvey Oswald worked for us. The aim of this dispatch =s to provide material countering and discrediting the claims of the =onspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims =n other countries. Background information is supplied in a classified =ection and in a number of unclassified attachments.

  2. Action. We do not recommend that discussion of the assassination =uestion be initiated where it is not already taking place. Where =iscussion is active [business] addresses are requested:

a. To discuss the publicity problem with (?J and friendly elite =ontacts (especially politicians and editors), pointing out that the =arren Commission made as thorough an investigation as humanly =ossible, that the charges of the critics are without serious =oundation, and that further speculative discussion only plays into the =ands of the opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy =alk appear to be deliberately generated by Communist propagandists. =rge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and =rresponsible speculation.

b. To employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of =he critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly =ppropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this =uidance should provide useful background material for passing to =ssets. Our ploy should point out, as applicable, that the critics are =1) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II) =olitically interested, (Ill) financially interested, (IV) hasty and

So thanks CIA, your "media assets" bought the label Cheers Ed Epstein www.edwardjayepstein.com ebooks at

http://amzn.to/ndfiNf

1419 files from the DOJ Epstein case media release. All files are public records from justice.gov.

Built by Truth Tide TV