Re: update
I'm very concerned that it appears we have moved back nor forward.
Hi Jeffrey,
I hope you are well. Attached are the updated public profile sites that you are on. I will be adding more photos to them tomorrow. You are now on about 10 of them now.
next on list for this week:
• could we get a specified pitch from Reputation? I would have to give your name though.
• handling wiki again tomorrow
• more photos from Cecile.
• more newsworthy info from Cecile-
• setting up a homebase website and link to all public profiles.
The last three will augment all of your public profiles.
Hi Jeffrey,
I am concerned too.
the only thing that is worse is the added caption under your wikipedia photo. Otherwise the first 2 pages on google are the same.
I am confident that I can provide good content (press, all PR, web inf.). But I really do think that you need a technical professional to get the bad stuff off of the first two pages.
The bad press are on prominent newspapers, like the NY Times, Forbes etc. And prominent sites like Wikipedia. These will dominate everything unless you get algorithmic work done.
Could I get going with Reputation and work alongside them?
I want to be effective and really do think that is the best technical approach.
The image contains contact information:
- Cell
yes, get a full proposal from reputation, otherwise I will need to terminate this effort. It is not working.