Re: fyi

I think you should ask Wendall to recall the meeting he had with Sussman an= Glenn. Glenn was unequivocal., adamant ,and loud in front of them b=th - that had he known about ziwrn taking money for the airplane ( form=the Highbridge acct no less , in dec of 04).. he would have immediatley t=ld me to take all my money out . He said he would have taken all his money=out .. We only receintly received the doc re garding the schulte =eeting„ ( shulte was called in in investigate the problem ), where tho=gh my oral redemption request was in oct, and the written reduced demand o= NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that infor=ed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows this!)/ =1 am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However, the legal is =bundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only=what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condr=n that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as=a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desir= , never to file suit. that should not be a factor in a fair resolution of=both issues. Im not sure if Condren can say Jeffreys claim is worth x- =illion if he were to file a claim , and only x minus, now that we know h= is unlikely to file

info needed, -- managed acct NAV at 10/05 10 /06. realized value,= .. redemption schedule, we have documnets that schulte had a me=ting to disclose wrongdoing sept 06 BEFORE my withdrawal request and the d=scussions why I should not redeem my entire 140 million. but reduce it to =0million. Managed acct should have had virtually the same assets as the Fu=d.

Jeffrey-Yes, we are going to have Condren step in here on this issue as=well as the Bear issues. We will have everyone get together this week, if=possible, and then we will see what to do from there. Mary