Re: marvin minsky

Jeffrey,

I have re-read couple of articles, internet and his =ast book. I would not take him too seriously, even for deep learning =80 and quantum computers are completely different. Even though extremely competent scientist at that time, he had limited set of d=ta to analyze — this was a while ago.

Regards

sb@

Try Acronis Da=a Cloud <https://www.acronis.comien-us/cloudiservice- #1Cloud Backup, DR, and File Sync & Share in a single solution<=b>

provider/=latform/> today

of course not , danny hillis. =AO and set lloyd are my go to today. m=rvin was 30 years ago.

Yes, I meant — limited data s=t even about deep learning

he knew nothing re deep learning. nor do=s most. I dont find it interesting. im=looking for bio computing. . where multiple inputs milli=ns grow and intersect. . algebric toplolgy or knot theory potentailly useful

I would not expect much out of bio co=puting, based on my knowledge of computer science, math and physics. Studied algebraic topology much 27 year ago for 1.5 years with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoly_Fomenko and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Novikov_(mathematician) =AO- and since then put lots of shit in my brain, so perhaps it is not work=ng

understood but he had no idea of toplogiiical data m=mt. or its potential in genetics. =AO he was a pure good but mostly philsophical thinker . =C2 i want a computer that feels? =AO what does that mean. muliptle inputs. overlaid. not only horizontally but vertically, more like music, =C2 in addtion to complex melodys in programming i want harmonies. =C2

He wanted to be popular at the end th=t is all. Last book is very romantic, and good read older people get lonely, I am starting to feel it 4 46

you look much younger. =C2 NOT