Re:

You might call the new coin a "Wee"

As in "we "the people

You can , and should , set up A "DAF " , = donor advised fund ( charitable deduction " for the =auses important to the deplorables . Look at cooperative structures =or exchange within communities and research campaign finance with coins.

And that's -just the start

Film sounds fun

How do we launch the c4 'Citizens of the American Republic' by=announcing we have $100 million worth of bitcoin--- that announcement alon= will cause a complete meltdown of the political world

Having our fec lawyers check all this but think 'property' is =ine as folks donate real assets all the time--this is same as a foundation=---when I save 'have' I mean we take it as a donation and then use=it on support of building out this grassroots army, unless you are saying we start to issue our own

Btw we would call it 'the citizen' Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

it is not the same- foundations like people are all =ot created equally. :). unlike cash the contributor could be setting=themselves up for problem ( tax) on contribution. ! If I were you , = would consider leap frogging these old patriarch created structures. there are many parameters to your issue and eac= parameter has some iterations. - BTW Noam Chomsky yeste=day referred to me as the Swiss Army Knife of finance. . not s=re the standard 501c4 is a pinnacle of todays possibilities. recall bitcoin is inhererently anoymous and bearer like. .,=C2 currently impossible to establish jurisdiction . custodianship=/ insurance. / agreed valuation/ regulation. =The film looks like s000 much fun.!

Film could be very cool

All in errols hands

1

1 I’m not sure c4 can accept “property =80 .
2 . Have bitcoin - Undefined term ,
3 . If not your hair , we will need to shampoo your think=ng :)

Im thinking about forming a church structure if prea=hing/politics rules apply. :) . or a Distributed L=3 . (straddles property and charity. ). beware gift taxes on =onations. very tricky to 501c4 if property. bundling rules. e=en funnier.