Re: KaiserDillon

sorry, Q=A0 i sugggested no heavyweights. . and said local.=only, I want a lawyeer that has worked on the same side as ASU 4>=A0 not opposite. I have spoken to others re your situation .

sorry, Q=A0 i sugggested no heavyweights. . and said local.=only, I want a lawyeer that has worked on the same side as ASU 4>=A0 not opposite. I have spoken to others re your situation .

can we find a jew. ? this opers=n that wrote you is a dope. of the first order. . = no need to be adversarial . to ASU. at all, =C240 YOU WILL LOSE if you are, guaranteed. !!!. 2. the =aw firm . already lost its case last time. . so .. 3. an=older woman lawyer. single practioner olk

Just had an hour consult with Justin Dillon of=KaiserDillon, probably the premiere Title IX firm in the country (you can =oogle all the work they have done). He is presently doing 2 cases at=ASU, and it turns out he read physics of star trek when he was in college =nd is a big fan. He seemed excellent and knew just how the system wo=ks (and has already once forced ASU to end a suspension of a student becau=e they violated his rights).

Anyway, we talked st=ategy etc, and I am confident if I went with a lawyer to keep me in my pos=tion at ASU they are the firm. They are not cheap though. $15K=retainer, and he expected the full process would probably be between $50-1=0K.

Let me be blunt. Ca= you help? I have already lost over $100K in speaking

engagements th=s year alone.

fine with whatever th= answer is.

There is no one else I would=ask so bluntly, nor anyone else I will be absolutely

Lawrence

look at hi.. he says he has worked with ASU counsels=before.. is not adversarial.

I have a few =ocal suggestions but not sure..

Here =s from a law professor at ASU:

"One of the p=oblems in finding a top law firm in this town that can be adverse to ASU i= that ASU uses most of these firms, including those I have worked withQ=A0or know people at and thus can recommend on personal expe=ience. For both for ethical and business reasons, however, these=firms can't or do not want to be adverse to ASU. The only firm that I =now something about that might be right for you and could take your case i= Martin & Bonnett http://www.martinbonnett.com/ http://www.martinbonnett.com/ I know them becau=e they represented a tenured ASU professor fired on what seemed to ma=y of us at the law school to be a trumped up charge of plagiarism. (She ha= plagiarized some material in her syllabus for which the university c=mmittee hearing hear case recommended a relatively light sanction. Cr=w rejected these findings and fired her. (The scuttlebutt was that she was=a major pain in the ass in her department and that was the real=C24>reason she was fired.) My late colleague Joe Feller worked closely wi=h this firm and arranged for the AAUP to file an amicus brief which m=ny members of the law faculty, including me, signed. Crow was none to happ= about this, btw. My sense is that although the professor lost h=r case (courts are reluctant to intervene in these types of case=, Martin & Bonnett did a good job. So when my dean fire= a secretary assigned to me, Paul Bender, and several others (including an=ther former dean), Paul and I contacted the firm for some advice. If =ou would like my help to find a firm in another city, especially LA, = should be able to offer you more selection and a more definite and k=owledgeable recommendation. Jim "

look at hi.. he says he has worked with ASU counsels=before.. is not adversarial.

I have a few =ocal suggestions but not sure..

Here =s from a law professor at ASU:

"One of the p=oblems in finding a top law firm in this town that can be adverse to ASU i= that ASU uses most of these firms, including those I have worked withQ=A0or know people at and thus can recommend on personal expe=ience. For both for ethical and business reasons, however, these=firms can't or do not want to be adverse to ASU. The only firm that I =now something about that might be right for you and could take your case i= Martin & Bonnett http://www.martinbonnett.com/ http://www.martinbonnett.com/ I know them becau=e they represented a tenured ASU professor fired on what seemed to ma=y of us at the law school to be a trumped up charge of plagiarism. (She ha= plagiarized some material in her syllabus for which the university c=mmittee hearing hear case recommended a relatively light sanction. Cr=w rejected these findings and fired her. (The scuttlebutt was that she was=a major pain in the ass in her department and that was the real=C24>reason she was fired.) My late colleague Joe Feller worked closely wi=h this firm and arranged for the AAUP to file an amicus brief which m=ny members of the law faculty, including me, signed. Crow was none to happ= about this, btw. My sense is that although the professor lost h=r case (courts are reluctant to intervene in these types of case=, Martin & Bonnett did a good job. So when my dean fire= a secretary assigned to me, Paul Bender, and several others (including an=ther former dean), Paul and I contacted the firm for some advice. If =ou would like my help to find a firm in another city, especially LA, = should be able to offer you more selection and a more definite and k=owledgeable recommendation. Jim "

na=cy says there is one female title IX lawyer in PHX. but she is the o=posite of what we want.. the angry woman type.. defends women abused by th= system.. yuck.. I think this is the right guy..

she sounds like our person if she will take your case= , the only goal is not to be fired. i= possible , keep money if you do get fired and or suspended. lawrenc=. this is not a case of a single or even two accusers . =C24, all the title 9 is out the window. it is hostile work en=iromnet. issue . as well. you and nancy, continue not to see c=early . sorry.

your case , is very very differ=nt. than most. all the things you have written about re =awyers is naive , uninformed an contrary to your interest in my opinion.=C24> however you are of course free to do as yo please , but i will=not fund your own strategic demise